JEWISH HYPOCRISY: CASE 9,204,334, 223

Jewish Author Tim Wise recently posted the following article (Paranoid Prejudice: Debunking the 'Jewish Conspiracy') at the Southern Poverty Law Center's "Tolerance" (!) site. It argues that the notion of disproportionate Jewish power and influence in popular culture is myth.

We responded to Mr. Wise (who, as his article at the Southern Poverty Law Center notes, invites feedback to his email address, which is posted as timjwise@mcn.com.

We said this:

Subject: Jewish Dominance
Mon, 8 Sep 2003

Dear Mr. Wise.
Insofar as you are so certain of your convictions about the negligible influence of Jewry in the mass media (and elsewhere), I'd be happy to engage you in a debate about this. We'll post the debate, in its entirety, at our web site (Jewish Tribal Review) and you can post it wherever you like (preferably at the Southern Poverty Law Center web site). You won't accept, of course. Because like every other Jewish apologist for Jewish power and influence, you're a fraudster. You'll lose the debate against the grandaddy of Internet "Jewish Power" documentation sites. As you know. Quite simply, we've researched the issue. And your self-appointed task is merely to veil the story.

Here's what we got back from timjwise@mcn.com :

Re: Jewish Dominance
Mon, 08 Sep 2003

Why don't you just respond to the article I have written and send me the response, bitch?

The points I made are mostly analytical, not a matter of how many Jewish individuals you can dig up who are prominent in media. William Pierce (whose body is being consumed by worms right about now, as is well deserved) did the ultimate research on this, and it meant nothing for the reasons pointed out in my article, among others. All of that info is irrelevant unless you a priori assume Jews are evil, which of course you do. Once you explain the statistical analysis I offered as wrong, and why it's wrong (i.e., the proper analysis is Jews in media/finance versus Jews in NY, since that is the hub of both industries where almost all the powerful players reside), then maybe I will listen to your ranting.

Until then you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up.

Love and kisses
Tim Wise

Oh, BTW, you should know something: federal law prohibits you from publishing any private email correspondence without the express permission of the author. I can send you the statute if you 'd like it. I most definitely do not give you permission to post or distribute anything I write to you (sorta like the part where I called you a punk ass nazi bitch, you punk ass nazi bitch), in any form. So, if you decide to print this email in whole or in part, I will file charges on your punk ass nazi bitch ass, and I'm sure I can find a nice Jewish federal prosecutor to charge you.
Hugs, Tim

EVALUATION OF WISE'S RESPONSE:

What are we to make of such an emotional reply, from a man who writes for a "Tolerance" organization? Mr. Wise, spewing to us the most astounding bigotry and nonsense, verges on the hysterical. Doesn't his email above sound like irrational "hate?" From what sources his rage emanates, we can only speculate. But our email was the scapegoat for it.

The Jewish Tribal Review does not feature the work of William Pierce. We also invite Mr. Wise (an unfortunately gross misnomer) to find a single thing at this web site that champions "Nazis." Nor will he find a single thing that champions "race," let alone "race wars." Unless Mr. Wise is upset with the fact that this web site examines, from a critical perspective, JEWISH racism.

In other words, Mr. Wise's response to us illustrates that he doesn't really know what he is talking about. His stereotypes about critics of Jewish/Zionist power and his intense emotionalism preclude any door to reason. When challenged, he collapses in pieces, quick to rail insults, threats, and libels to any who question him.

We are civil in our statements. We do not call Mr. Wise a "bitch," a "Nazi," an "ass," a "punk" or any of his other epithets. His slurs to us are libels. We call him a fraud as a representative of "tolerance" (and a misrepresenter of current and historical fact) which his email to us substantiates.

Why is it that everywhere hypocrites like Mr. Wise are afforded room in major public forums to discuss issues of "tolerance," when they only accept the term as it benefits their own communal interests?

And then such men, in "private," in situations like this simple email exchange in which he threatens the usual litany of lawsuits and censorship for daring to replicate his hypocrisy, Mr. Wise doesn't seem to grasp the fact that "tolerance" is a concept that encompasses respect also for others' social and political views. He doesn't have to agree with them, but in a free society it's supposed to be kosher to make your argumentative case.

The Jewish Tribal Review represents none of the libels he aims at us. Except that we dare to criticize the tribal Jewish community, its power and ethnocentrism, which is an unforgiveable sin in his eyes, and grounds for his displays of intense, indiscriminate, and categorical loathing.

Per lawsuits: Why does Mr. Wise insist upon wrapping himself in tired old Jewish stereotypes: the Jew who, unable to win a moral debate, wants to sue all and everything? The Jew who seeks to suppress free speech by tricks of law? The Jew whose first option is to always run to -- and, yes, Mr. Wise proclaimed it -- the Jewish lawyer, to suppress, to suffocate, to intimidate?

Mr. Wise did not have to respond to our query. In a free society (or has that changed lately?), we have the obvious right to post his response to us. His words were directed to -- and sent to -- us. It is of course ours more than his: the downside variant of someone who presents a gift.

If Mr. Wise chooses to claim that a burglar broke into his house, gagged and bound him, commandeered his computer, his passwords, and the email address he posts with his articles, and wrote the message to us against his will, that is his moral option. We'll post that.

It's obviously time for some whistle-blowing about Mr. Wise: people need to know about how he functions in the real world, not under the illusory cover of "Tolerance" drapes.

We will deconstruct his article about Jewish power as time allows. We will post it here. And we will invite him, with civility, to respond to it. We expect from him more threats, more insults, more schemes to harm, and nothing whatsoever of logical and moral substance.

Or, more likely, as is so common, he will present us the usual Wall of Silence when he is proven to be wrong.

Just browse this web site. The Judeocentric propagandist can't win. Unless they shut down free speech venues and haul their critics off to jail for daring to tell the truth.

MR. WISE EMAILS US WITH A FOLLOW-UP, AFTER READING THE ABOVE.

OUR DETAILED RESPONSE TO MR. WISE'S "PREJUDICE" ARTICLE.

WE AWAIT HIS REPLY.

Surprise. Weeks go by and no reply to criticism of Wise's article, but a JTR reader alerts us to the fact that he's since had an article posted at the left-wing online journal, CounterPunch. And here Mr. Wise is quite the obnoxious Jewish hypocrite, and he knows no shame. Here, in trashing Christian rights, he's offended at the notion of someone telling him rhetorically to "go to Hell," when here's what he emailed to us when we suggested he engage us in an online debate about one of his earlier articles:

"you are just a punk ass nazi bitch, with nothing of value to say. Start the race war you piece of shit, or shut the fuck up."

Persecuting the Truth Claims of Christian Victimization Ring Hollow,
By TIM WISE, CounterPunch, November 8, 2003
"There are plenty of things that school children have to worry about, and being punished for expressing their religiosity is simply not among them, especially if they are in the majority, that is to say, Christian. On the other hand, to be of another faith, or purely secular is to invite regular abuse from peers and authority figures alike. Don't believe me? Well then, you can go to hell. Now tell me, how did that feel? Probably not very good, right? Well keep reading, and try and put aside how offended you may be, and should be, at the above epithet hurled your way so as to make a point, for indeed there is a point to be made here. You see, when a person says "Go to hell," as I just did, we all recognize it as a personal attack, a slur of sorts, an ad hominem invective that is wholly inappropriate to rational discourse. It is not a comment that invites discussion or debate, rather it shuts down both. It is a period at the end of the sentence, not a comma or colon leading to something more prosaic. Now try this one on for size: You are going to hell. A little more abstract, a few extra letters on the end of the word go, and stated as opinion rather than exclamation, but overall pretty similar. And to some of us, every bit as offensive. Yet "you are going to hell" is what many of us hear day in and day out, from the time we are children, if we fail to adhere to the "one true faith" proclaimed by the likes of William Boykin and most every evangelical Christian in the United States. To we who are Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindu, Sufi, Sikh, some combination of these or of no faith tradition at all, being told that we are going to hell is no different than being commanded to go to said place in a moment of anger. In fact, the former is more offensive than the latter precisely because it comes from a place of judgment, it involves casting aspersions not just upon our persons (which is also implicit in telling someone to go to hell) but our souls. It is to say that we are less than whole, less than precious in the eyes of the Creator of the Universe. It is to say, in short, that we are inferior peoples. And it is something that no Christian has ever been told by a single one of our number, so no, they cannot possibly relate. Christians may think they are persecuted because the law won't allow them to read Christian prayers over the school intercom, or because they can't plop a giant monument of the Ten Commandments down in a public building, but trust me, that is not persecution. It is not persecution to be given a failing grade when your class paper on Jesus as an historical figure uses only one source, the Bible, as a reference, as happened to one student a few years ago. Such a paper deserves an F, and the student who thinks a few lines from John or Matthew constitute an acceptable bibliography should put down scripture, pick up a dictionary and look up the meaning of the term research. It is not persecution to be told that you can't send a stack of Christian comic books to your son serving in the Middle East, as happened to one family recently, and as Limbaugh laments in his book ... It is not persecution when schools, seeking to be more inclusive of non-majority students, change the annual Christmas pageant or celebration to a generic holiday celebration. It may be silly, it may or may not be Constitutionally-required, but it is certainly not a form of anti-Christian repression. Persecution is having a teacher tell you that the faith of your family is illegitimate and that you are going to spend eternity in a lake of fire surrounded by demons, and being told that all of your family who have died heretofore are already there preparing a space for you. Been there, done that. Persecution is being corralled into an assembly in your public school and being forced to listen to a proselytizing representative of a Christian youth group call the students to proclaim their devotion to Jesus, and to imply that those who won't do so are lost souls. Been there, done that. Persecution is writing an eighth grade term paper in that same public school, in which you examine both sides of the school prayer issue evenhandedly, but are graded down because the title you chose, "Our Father Who Art in Homeroom?" is deemed sacrilegious by your fundamentalist teacher. Been there, done that."