JEWISH OR ZIONIST?


The following paragraph was posted on 10/14/03 at the home page of the web site WHAT REALLY HAPPENED:

Jews against Zionism.
"Contrary to the propaganda put out by Israel's supporters, Israel is NOT supported by the majority of the world's Jewish people. Ariel Sharon does not speak for all Jewish people. And being anti-Israel is not "anti-Semitic". -- Michael Rivero, WHAT REALLY HAPPENED [emphasis added by Jewish Tribal Review]


Our query to the webmaster of WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, Michael Rivero:

Dear Mr. Rivero:

Your web site WHAT REALLY HAPPENED is excellent, and your dedication in opposing racist Zionism is highly commendable. But what is your evidence for your belief that most Jews DO NOT support Israel, other than an article of your firm faith? Or hope? Or wish? Or dream?

Stating that most Jews DO NOT support Israel is blatantly false. Your statement is propagandistic (I suspect unintentionally) for it has no basis in reality.

Zionism is an outgrowth of Judaism. It was created by international Jewry, and the state of Israel is central to modern Jewish identity, whether secular or religious.

Why are you, like so many, so terribly timorous about the root cause of the Zionist problem? The Palestinian Intifada has been going on, off and on, for many years now. You can't hope to realistically solve the problem of "Zionist" racism without honestly FACING exactly what it is.

I submit to you the following evidence (all from Jewish scholarship and commentary) against your naive conviction about American (and international) Jewish community and its relation to Israel. Please bear in mind that most of these people are academics who have extensively studied their fields of commentary:


* "The US Jews can't be persuaded to change their mind. View the results of a recent national Jewish public opinion survey in the US [1]: - Eighty-six percent of American Jews feel close to Israel; eighty-five percent of American Jews supports Israel in the ongoing conflict, and one percent supports the Palestinians. The survey proves that our wonderful Jewish friends of Palestine in the US represent roughly one per cent of the US Jews, or in plain words represent nothing. Some of them are crypto-Zionists providing alibi for the Jews and bringing disarray into our lines. Some of them are good and sincere people, great fighters for the cause of equality, like Jeff Blankfort or Ronald Bleier and many others. All of them are removed from positions of power and are rightly disregarded by power-seeking American elites as representing no one but goodness of their hearts. The survey indicates we should stop dallying for Jewish support and look for a strategy to win over the American - and the world - non-Jewish public opinion." -- Israel Shamir, in his recent article "A Mistake of Prof Neumann" (2)

[1] 08-06-2002; US Newswire. The survey carried out July 11-21 by Stanley B. Greenberg, Ph.D. of Greenberg, Quinlan, Rosner Research Inc. for the American Jewish Committee, one of the largest public opinion research projects ever carried out in the U.S. to gauge attitudes towards Israel. It was done in conjunction with a new strategic team, focusing on how Americans view Israel, which includes Greenberg, Democratic strategist Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, and Republican pollsters Frank Luntz, Ph.D. and Neil Newhouse. The American Jewish Committee is taking a leading role in this effort. [This paragraph is taken from Israel Shamir's footnotes in his article; see below (2) ]

[2] Shamir, Israel. A Mistake of Prof Neumann. October 2003


*Results of Poll Sponsored by Israel Policy Forum, the Jewish Week, and the Wilstein Institute of Jewish Policy Studies Studies,
Jewish Week
, November 20, 2001
This poll of Jewish Americans found "the most important issue or problem facing the Jewish community in the United States today" to be 1) anti-Semitism [23%], 2) Peace and Security for Israel, 3) Terrorism [13%], 4) Intermarriage [i.e., marrying non-Jews - 12%], and 5) U.S.-Israeli relations [8%]. Public education was 8th, poverty and hunger 9th, and the environment 10th [all with 1%]. 89% of respondents were "strongly favorable' or "somewhat favorable" to Israel. (Another 5% ventured no opinion, 1% didn't respond, 3% were "somewhat unsupportive, and 2% "strongly unsupportive.") 59% were even "strongly favorable" or "somewhat favorable" to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, who faces a possible trial in Belgium for war crimes in Lebanon.



The following research about Jews and Zionism is from:
When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America
.


The particular chapter from which this material is excerpted is at: http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/20popcul1.htm

Its bibliography is listed at: http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/30bibl1.htm

The central icon of allegiance for Jewish transnational solidarity and the major object of Jewish money rites is the modern state of Israel, the country which, says Nathan Glazer, "after 1967 ... became the religion of American Jews." [LIPSET, p. 157]  "Nobody can deny the intensity of the American Jew's feelings about the state of Israel," noted James Yaffe in 1968, "Polls taken in 1967 during the six-day war showed that 99 percent of all American Jews supported Israel wholeheartedly against the Arab nations. Hardly any Jews who lived through those days didn't feel a weight of anxiety on his spirits -- and a wild elation when the weight was finally lifted." [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 181] "The [1967] war," says Jack Wertheimer, "... converted American Jewry to Zionism. Whereas American Jews had demonstrated sympathy in the past, Israel was now incorporated into the very structure of American Jewish identity." [WERTHEIMER, J., 1993, p. 30]

Even earlier though, "today all Jews are Zionists," noted a Buffalo (New York) rabbi as early as 1936, "That is as true as any statement so brief can be in so controversial a field as Jewish life." [ADLER/CONNOLLY, 1960, p. 390, 460] "American Jewry is deeply committed to the state of Israel," wrote Monford Harris in 1965, "of this there can be no doubt." [HARRIS, M., 1965, p. 80]

As Milton Plesur noted in 1982:

"Another issue that concerned postwar American Jewish community was that of Zionism and the special relationship between American Jews and the state of Israel. Zionism had come to influence the organizational structure of Jewish life on both the national and local levels. Mosts synagogues, Jewish community centers, religious schools, and virtually all the organizational societies that composed the American Jewish community espoused the Zionist cause." [PLESUR, M., 1982, p. 194]

In 1981, a World Jewish Congress report noted

"In the past three decades, Israel has served most Western Jews as a surrogate for the traditional Judaism from which they had strayed. Concern and support for Israel increasingly became the chief source and expression of their sense of Jewish identity. Fund raising, chiefly for Israel, and political activity to ensure the security and survival of Israel, have been the major activities of Jewish organizations during this period, especially in the United States [WALINSKY, L., 1981, p. 61] ... There can be no doubt that Israel
will continue to play the central role in Jewish life." [WALINSKY, L., 1981,  p. 69]

     "Solidarity between the Jews of the west, Israel, the Soviet Union, and threatened diaspora communities has become more than the object of activism," says British rabbi Jonathan Sacks, "it has become a carrier of identity." [SACKS, J., One, p. 11] "I speak to many Jewish communities around the world," says Yitzhak Herzog, "and what strikes me is that each community is of a different nature than the other. The common denominator that I find in all is Israel. They are obsessed with Israel and you can say that Israel, in effect, has become their religion, as well as a social and political idea which they are involved." [HERZOG, p. 20] "Jewish communities throughout the world," noted Irving Louis Horowitz in 1976, "have increased their 'particularistic' interests in Israel, often at the expense of their 'universalistic' concerns for others. Israel unifies the Jewish community worldwide, giving it a sense of solidarity that transcends psychological anxieties and geographical differences, however sharp or obscure." [HOROWITZ, I., 1976, p. 361]
 
Even in Costa Rica, for example, a Jewish scholar noted in 1987 that "today, as in the past, Costa Rican Jewry has tended to adopt a unified political stance only vis-a-vis the question of the state of Israel." [GUDMUNDSON, p. 229] 

Venezuela
? "Nearly a thousand Venezuelan Jews have settled in Israel," noted Howard Sachar in 1985, "Zionism is also the principal motif of Venezuelan Jewish education." [SACHAR, H., 1985, p. 266] 

Brazil
? "It seems," says Henrique Rattner, "that the main objective of Jewish politics in Brazil today concern the defense of specifically Jewish interests in the fight against anti-Semitism and the preservation of the state of Israel and of the Brazilian Jewish community's identification with it." [RATTNER, p. 199]
 
France? "No other western Jewish community has been as passionately pro-Israel as French Jewry," noted the Jerusalem Post in 1997, "--defying media charges of dual loyalty ... More than 30,000 French Jews visit Israel each year and over a thousand are currently studying at Israeli universities." [PICKETT, W., p. 7] 

The Jews of Brussels, in Belgium? "An affluent community, the 24,000 Jews of Brussels have developed their own version of a United Jewish Appeal. Contributions are generous and the lion's share goes to Israel. If Brussels Jewry evinces a distinguishing feature, it is its Zionism and secular character." [SACHAR, H., 1985, p. 46]
 
South Africa? "South Africa's small but influential Jewish population of 118,000," wrote Seymour Hersh about the late 1970s and early 1980s, "were always large contributors to Israeli bond drives and charities; now [with the 1977 election of Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin] they became more vocal in their support for Israel's more conservative political parties, including Menachem Begin's Likud Party." [HERSH, S., p. 264] "Zionism had from its beginnings cast a spell upon the Jews of South Africa," adds Barnet Litvinoff. [LITVINOFF, B., p. 184] "Nowhere else in the Jewish world, conceivably," observes Howard Sachar, "was Zionism so integral a feature of Jewishness as South Africa ... South African Jewry has not rested in its exertions on Israel's behalf. The Zionist Federation remains by far the most important organization in Jewish life." [SACHAR, H., 1985, p. 187, 190]
 
Canada? In 1999, in Montreal, the Quebec prime minister's brother, Gerard Bouchard, "initiated a conference for French and Jewish Quebecers because he wanted to know why, as a minority, Jews are not more sensitive to French Quebecers fears for the survival of their culture [in English-dominated Canada] and why they seem to focus on anti-Semitism in Quebec and not in English Canada and why they do not have more sympathy for Quebec sovereignty when they themselves had such an attraction to Israel." [ARNOLD, J., p. 3, 25]  "American Jews automatically think of themselves as Americans," noted Jewish commentator Barnet Litvinoff in 1969, "but in Canada they are primarily Jews. Hence Zionism makes much more headway in Canada than the U.S.A. ... In Canada, as in Britain, there exists a comprehensive Jewish representative organization making for tribal unity and discipline." [LITVINOFF, B., p. 172] "Montreal Jews," noted Erna Paris in 1980, "are notably dedicated to Israel and observably generous in their contributions to the United Jewish Appeal." [PARIS, E., p. 102] "Among the priorities of the Canadian Jewish polity," noted Harold Troper in 1999, "is defining and promoting the relationship between Jews in Canada, Jews in Israel, and Jews in other parts of the diaspora." [TROPER, H., 1999, p. 230]
 
Russia? American Jewish efforts to Zionize the Jews of former communist Russia was noted in a 1999 article in the Baltimore Jewish Times: "United States Jewish groups have contributed heavily to building synagogues, community centers, and schools in Russia ... Privately, many Jewish leaders say that community building encourages many [Russian] Jews to make aliyah [emigration to Israel] by building a sense of Jewish identity that will be Israel-centered." [BESSER, 4-30-99, p. 30] And as Irving Horowitz noted as early as 1979, "The fact that Israel can call upon a hidden Jewish constituency overt in the United States and covert in the Soviet Union does indeed give weight and substance to the Israeli claim that it is not simply a small power which can be regulated or mortgaged at the behest of the major powers, but a force of international socio-economic weight as well as national interests." [HOROTWITZ, I., 1979, p. 104]
 
Argentina? Like many -- probably most -- Jews, news mogul Jacobo Timerman equates raising verifiably troubling questions about Jewish collectivist behavior the world over as tantamount to expressions of Nazism:
 
"In Argentina, in 1980, thirty-five years after Hitler's defeat, on the army-controlled television channel in Buenos Aires, one heard the following questions voiced by a journalist who has practiced his profession for twenty years and is not naive, the brother of a general who heads the press services of the military government: Why aren't there any poor Jews? Why do Jews give so much money to Israel? Why don't Jews marry Catholics? Why do Jews consider themselves superior? A repetition of the insults and defamations of Nazi rulers, stemming from one of the most powerful forces in Argentine life, the army. It's easy enough to react to this anti-Semitic campaign, to feel offended." [TIMERMAN, J., 1981, p. 144]

In 2001, the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles featured an article about the immigrant Jewish Iranian community in that city, based on a familiar theme:

"Persian Jews are facing challenges familiar to previous generations of Jewish
immigrants; among them, dilution of traditional values and assimilation. 'There
is no question there is an influence of materialism,' [Sam] Kermanian [head of  the Iranian-American Jewish Federation] said. 'Some of the old values are still  holding the community together, but, obviously, this is something that will not last forever. We know that within a generation or two, we will assimilate into a larger landsape. Our goal is to make sure that we assimilate into the American Jewish community rather than the secular American landscape." [AUSHENKER, M., 6-20-01]
 
Incredibly, of all the cultural, ethnic, and religious aspects of being Jewish, in a 1988 Los Angeles Times national survey 17% of American Jews believed that support for the state of Israel was the most important part of their Jewish identity. [WAXMAN, p. 137]  Even more startling, a 1990 American Jewish Committee survey of "American Jewish leaders" across the country found that 81% listed the "safety of Israel as the most important item on the Jewish agenda today." Nearly half of the leaders were under fifty years old, 94% were married to fellow Jews (plus 3% to spouses who had converted to Judaism), a quarter of them had a household income between $200,000 and $499,000, and another third between $100,000-$199,000. [AIN, SURVEY, p. 28]
 
A 1983 poll of American Jews at-large found that 20% had even written to an elected official on behalf of Israel. [BRENNER, p. 123]  The 1990 National Jewish Population Survey found that 76% of American Jews described themselves at least "somewhat attached to Israel." [HALBERSTAM, p. 188] Of high importance to an overwhelming number of those who call themselves Jews, 85% of Jewish respondents in the 1983 poll favored strong United States support for Israel, a figure that is consistent with other surveys. [WAXMAN, p. 136-137]    (Meanwhile, says Jewish critic Lenni Brenner, "American Jewry has one of the weakest military traditions in America. Many Jewish immigrants came here to get away from conscription."  [BRENNER, p. 131]
 
A 1998 national poll conducted by the Los Angeles Times and Newsday found that 43% of American Jewish respondents had donated money to Israel in the past year; 60% of those over 65 years of age said they had given money in the same time period to the Jewish state. [FRIEDMAN, J., p. A7] "For me to be a Jew today," said Canadian Sarah Tobin in 1990 (she had lived in Israel for a few years),
 
"means having a personal relationship with Israel. This is my bottom line, my definition of Judaism. Israel is the overriding reality in Jewish life today. It tempers, it touches, it colors every aspect of our Jewish behavior and thoughts ... Most of the Americans who support Israel don't know any Israelis at all ... What is my connectedness? My connectedness is the concept, the mythology. Reality is secondary. It can't change my connectedness." [STARR, J., 1990, p. 148-149]
 
"For tens of thousands of Jewish Americans," says Joyce Starr,
 
"Israel has become so central to their lives that dedication to 'the country' has become a religion unto itself, without religiosity. Deeply committed American Jews spend the better part of their working and/or leisure hours thinking about, working on behalf of, and worrying about the State of Israel ... The centrality of Israel to the lives of committed American Jews is all but impossible for Israelis to fathom. Israel has become the anchor of life, the psychological spring of renewal, the singular rationale for feelings of self-worth for hundreds of thousands of American Jews." [STARR, 1990, p. 159]
 
     "The image of Israel," note Charles Liebman and Steven Cohen, "so central to the lives of American Jews, is projected as that of a country surrounded by enemies bent on its destruction ... And the Holocaust itself, which along with Israel has assumed central symbolic importance in American Jewish life, reminds Jews above all of their precarious status among the hostile Gentiles. These themes tend to be combined in appeals by Jewish organizations for funds." [LIEBMAN/COHEN, p. 32] "American Jewish life," wrote Seymour Lipset and Earl Raab in 1995, "embodies a kind of 'cultural Zionism,' which recognizes Israel as its spiritual center, inspiring rather than assembling the Jews of the world." [LIPSET/RAAB, p. 130] Since 1967, notes Allon Gal, "virtually all American Jewish community organizations have become supporters of the Jewish state and have developed some variation of 'a vision of Israel.' [GAL, p. 13]  Since 1967 too, notes Theodore Solotaroff, "the survival of Israel has been the paramount concern of organized Jewish life and probably the paramount source of Jewish identity." [BARACK-FISHMAN, p. 279]
 
     "The oneness that holds Jews together," says Edward Shapiro, "is no longer Judaism or anti-Semitism but Israel ... Israel provides the link that bonds Jews together, no matter how remote they might be from any involvement in Jewish society or religious life. The Jewish thing most Jews have in common [is] ... contributing at least a nominal sum to the United Jewish Appeal." [SHAPIRO, E., Jewish American, p. 169] "Central to the understanding of American Jewish identity," notes Marla Brettschneider," is this idea of being pro-Israel ... By the 1970s, as the [Jewish] mainstream organizations began to wield unprecedented power in Washington D.C., the litmus test for the stance constituting such an attitude reached hegemonic proportions ... Many had come to feel that on issues relating to Israel, the American Jewish community had become a closed political space, an area where neither dissent, nor even debate, is tolerated." [BRETTSCHNEIDER, M., Cornerstone, p. 1-2]
    
Research studies by the American Jewish Committee, noted David Schnall in 1987,
 
"indicate that U. S. Jews overwhelmingly support Israel by every standard definition of the term. Over 90 per cent said they paid special attention to media reports about Israel, and a similar proportion declared themselves 'pro-Israeli' or 'very pro-Israeli.' In addition, about three-quarters said that caring about Israel was a very important part of their Jewish identity and that they frequently talked about Israel with friends and relatives." [SCHNALL, p. 122]

In 2001, the United Jewish Communities (formerly the United Jewish Appeal)-- the foremost Jewish solidarity organization -- announced its new "$4 million solidarity campaign titled 'Israel Now'" to propagandize for the Jewish state and sanitize its miserable human rights record towards the Palestinians. "Campaign highlights" included:


   * "Heavy promotion of solidarity missions to Israel."
   * "Advocacy- and media-training for campus and community activists ... 'to train

      their leadership to become strong advocates on behalf of Israel.'"
   * "A 'media tour' that will take Israeli spokesmen and U. S. Middle East
      experts -- scholars, journalists and other opinion-shapers -- into key communities

      across North America to meet with local media."
   * "A Solidarity Shabbat on Sept. 22-23 that will reach out to synagogues,
     churches and university campuses to show that 'support for Israel extends
     beyond the Jewish community.'" [JORDAN, M., 6-19-01]


A survey of 443 Jews in a "leadership training" program (1978-80) at the United Jewish Appeal revealed a range of disturbing attitudes among leadership in the American Jewish polity. Every single one of them agreed with the statement "When the state of Israel is threatened, all Jews are threatened." From there, 70% of the respondents stated that they were more emotionally moved by listening to Israel's nation anthem (the Hatikvah) than the Star-Spangled Banner. (Another 7% of the total "weren't sure" about it.) 97% of these people even believed that the conflict between Israel and its Arab neighbors was the most important problem facing American Jews. Yet by almost a two to one margin these future Jewish leaders rejected the notion that Jews are "overly concerned with Israel." 95% even  declared that "I'm happy to be an American." Not surprisingly, over 60% agreed with the assertion (even in this non-religious context) that "The Jewish people is the Chosen People." Another 15% claimed they "weren't sure" if they were the Chosen People or not, leaving only the remaining 15% to outright reject this age-old source of Jewish racism and chauvinism, and inevitable Gentile hostility. "Perhaps ... the most important [myth of civil Judaism]," says Jonathan Woocher, "[is] the barely distinguished reaffirmation of the myth of Jews as a chosen people ... In short, the myths of civil Judaism are the myths of a modern messianic religion." [WOOCHER, p. 131-132] "A secular holiness," notes Emil Fackenheim," side by side with the religious, is becoming manifest in contemporary Jewish existence." [SACKS, J., p. 136]

Particularly noteworthy in the UJA survey was the Jewish leadership response to the statement "The primary loyalty of American Jews must be to the United States and their fellow Americans." Over 50% (58, 52, and 56 per cent in three distinct groups) disagreed. Coupled with the "not sure" response, 77, 67, and 71% of these future Jewish polity leaders did not agree with this statement of loyalty to their fellow Americans.
 
In this context, it is certainly legitimate to wonder about the implications of the well known statement by the prominent 20th century American rabbi, Stephen Wise: "I may have been an American for sixty-four years, but I have been a Jew for four thousand years." [HERTZLER, p. 76]

"It is alarming," wrote a Jewish anti-Zionist, William Zukerman, in the decade after the founding of the state of Israel,

"to discover how Israeli nationalism has penetrated into American life and thought. It has not only deeply affected organized Jewish communal life, philanthropy, the synagogue, the press, the lecture forum, social centers and clubs, but it is also attempting to influence American literature, at least that literature created by American Jews ... [ZUKERMAN, p. 126] ... The average Zionist is very sensitive about the question of double loyalty. The fanatic becomes furious when the subject is merely mentioned; the more tolerant person tries to evade it. But none can escape it. The specter of dual loyalty doggedly follows Zionism like its shadow ... [ZUKERMAN, p. 228] ... This new nationalism and spirituality ... can convert American Jewry into a 'colony,' or worse yet, into a satellite which takes orders and lives merely for the sake of its ideological parent." [ZUKERMAN, p. 232]
 
In 1982,  another Jewish anti-Zionist, Alfred Lilienthal, wrote that
 
"This and this alone is the issue: will American Jews allow Zionism to separate themselves from America as a special collective whose fate is outside and beyond the American fate? ... The sentimental affection that Americans of Irish (or Italians or French) birth have for their country of origins offers no analogy to the feeling toward Israel exhibited by many American Jews ... It is beneath anybody's self-respect to go on pretending that Zionism was merely an attempt to enrich American folklore by promoting a Jewish counterpart to the St. Patrick's Day Parade. Zionism is a hard-headed political creed which proposes to subject American Jews to the sovereignty of Israel." [LILIENTHAL, p. 231]
 
"This curious [Jewish] feeling [for Israel]," says Jewish author James Yaffe, "has very little in common, I think, with anything that the Irishman feels for the Free State or the Italian for Sicily. No Sicilian ever loved his country for its military power; no Irishman in his right mind ever praised the Free State for its tremendous economic expansion. What they feel for the old country is all nostalgia, but the American Jew's feeling for Israel has something else in it." [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 190] "American Jews have a profound dedication to Israel," noted Irving Friedman, the executive vice-president of the United Jewish Appeal in 1973. [GOLDEN, H., 1973, p. 120] "Even if they are not Zionists according to classic definition," noted David Mittelberg in 1999, "most American Jews are pro-Israel. They support Israel 'politically, economically, and emotionally.'" [MITTELBERG, D., 1999, p. 7] "[F]or virtually all the Jews in Canarsie [an area of Brooklyn, New York]," wrote Jonathan Reider in his study of Jews and Italians there, "the observant and the faithless, Zionism was inseparable from the issue of [Jewish] communal survival." [REIDER, J., 1985, p. 47]

Former American Jewish Committee official Stephen Steinlight admits Jewish "dual loyalty" freely; it began to trouble him when the balkanized American society Jews have been instrumental in creating seemed to be threatening Jewish interests (i.e., that other minority groups were seizing the Jewish-inspired model):

    "We cannot pretend we are only part of the solution when we are also part of the
     problem; we have no less difficult a balancing act between group loyalty and a
     wider sense of belonging to America. That America has tolerated this dual
     loyalty -- we get a free pass, I suspect, largely over Christian guilt about the
     Holocaust -- makes it no less a reality." [STEINLIGHT, S., OCTOBER 2001]


     "In recent years," notes Jewish scholar Peter Novick, "it has become not just permissible but in some circles laudable for American Jews to assert the primacy of Jewish over American loyalty. 'We are Jews first and whatever else second,' says Rabbi Haskel Lookstein, the author of a searing indictment of American Jews' reaction to the Holocaust." [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 34]
 
     "No other people in the world is so attached to its country of origin -- Palestine [i.e., Israel] -- as the Jews," wrote Nahum Goldmann, head of the World Jewish Congress and World Zionist Organization,
 
"who are bound by feeling and religion, as well as by utterly mystical ties ... [GOLDMANN, 1978, p. 7] ... The Jews are the most separatist people in the world. Their belief in the notion of the chosen people is the basis of their entire religion. All down the centuries the Jews have intensified their separation from the non-Jewish world; they have rejected, and still do reject, mixed marriages; they have put up one wall after another to protect their existence as a people apart, and have built their ghettos with their own hands." [GOLDMANN, 1978, p. 8]
 
In 1959, in a survey of 1,000 teachers in Jewish schools in the United States, only 48 were found to be "teaching Israel as a subject of study." By the early 1980s, 98% "included Israel/Zionism in some form or another as part of the curriculum." [ACKERMAN, W, p. 179-180]  By 1996, some 40-45% of all American Jewish children attended part-time Jewish schools where there is, notes Walter Ackerman, "an increased commitment to the idea that Israel is central to the identity of Jews growing up in America." Noting the preponderance of Israelis actually teaching the courses in Jewish American schools, he adds that "today it is doubtful that Jewish education in the United States could function without Israelis." [ACKERMAN, W, p. 187-188]
 
As James Yaffe noted in 1968:
 
"Synagogues around the country have become Israel-minded: they raise money for Israel; they say prayers for Israel on the Sabbath; they display Israeli flags and play Israeli melodies; they teach Israeli folk songs and dances in their religious schools; they sell Israeli popular art, like dolls, prayer shawls ... Israel has also become a major political issue among American Jews. Most of them don't know what the Diaspora is and
aren't aware of being in it, yet they would almost automatically vote against any politician, Jew or gentile, who they felt was anti-Israel." [YAFFE, J., 1968, p. 187]

     In a textbook for Jewish high school students published by the Union of American Hebrew Congregations in 1964, Rabbi Roland Gittelsohn tells his students:

     "Our continued financial and political help is still needed by Israel ... Intelligent,
     well-trained Americans can help Israel immeasurably by their willingness to
     to volunteer for limited periods of service there. During the Arab War of 1948,
     many young Americans -- including some Christians -- volunteered for
     military service on Israel's behalf because they saw in the new State
     an expression of the highest and finest American ideals of democracy."
     [GITTLESOHN, R., 1964, p. 223-224]


"Popular Jewish attitudes [have] underwent a profound 'Israelization,'" wrote Peter Novick in 1999,

 "The hallmark of the good Jew became the depth of his or her commitment
 to Israel. Failure to fulfill religious obligations, near-total Jewish illiteracy,
even intermarriage, were all permissible; lack of enthusiasm for the Israeli
cause (not to speak of public criticism of Israel) became unforgiveable ...
The presence of Israeli artifacts in the living room became as mandatory
as a mezuzah on the doorpost. (In none of this was any knowledge of
Israel required. A survey in the 1980s revealed that fewer than a third of
American Jews knew that the archenemies Menachem Begin and Shimon
Peres
were members of different parties)." [NOVICK, P., 1999, p. 148]
 

"In a bulletin of the Washington Heights, New York, Sunday School of the Y.M.H.A. and Y.W.H.A. (Sunday School Life, Chanukah issue)," noted Alfred Lilienthal in 1982, "one reads this extraordinary pledge of young Americans: 'Here is our pledge, Israel: I pledge my loyalty to God, to the Torah and to the Jewish people and to the Jewish state ... When a questionnaire was issued to pupils of the public school system in Galveston, Texas, 102 students answered the question 'What is your nationality?' with 'Jewish.'" [LILIENTHAL, p. 23] 

And the results of such socialization? Take, for example, the case in 1999 when an American Jewish teenager, Abraham Derman, made international news when he cut through a razor wire fence at Boston's Logan airport, climbed into an open jet unnoticed, and rode with other passengers to London. Why? He "told investigators that he wanted to go to Israel and had hopes the stunt would help him get a job with Mossad [Israel's international spy agency]." [BORGER, J., 7-30-99, p. 15]

Somewhat similarly, in 1997, California-born Israeli soldier Adam Sager made Jewish American news for winning an Israeli Defense Force poetry contest. "The poet's affinity for Israel surfaced at a young age," noted the Jewish Bulletin. "Ever since I was 5," said Sager, "my parents would ask me, 'Adam, what do you want for your birthday?' And I would always answer, 'I want to go to Israel.'" [KATZ, L., 1997, p. 29] "Between the years 1966 and 1993," notes David Mittelberg, "just over a quarter of a million Jewish youngsters from all over the world participated in some type of educational program in Israel under the auspices of the Jewish Agency." [MITTELBERG, D., 1999, p. 13]
 
In 1981, Jewish author Ann Roiphe went to her daughter's kindergarten class and listened to another mother gush about her own child drawing pictures of the Star of David:
 
"Look at that Jewish star, look at the picture of her family. She knows she's Jewish. Jewish and family; those are the two pillars of her identity. Isn't that really healthy?" [ROIPHE, 1981, p. 50]
 
Roiphe, looking around the room at non-Jewish children, observed that "None of the Christian children had drawn crosses or churches." [ROIPHE, 1981, p. 52]
 
"To the extent that we may identify Zionism with support for Israel," notes David Schnall, " -- and there will be some who object to this identification -- the United States Jewish community has been 'Zionized.' The battles of the past -- fears of dual loyalties  ... have not so much been won as made irrelevant." [SCHNALL, p. 122]

In the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks in America, and worries about increased balkanization of American ethnic cultures that could undercut Jewish ethnocentric interests , Stephen Steinlight (former Director of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee) had some confessing to do:


     "We cannot consider the inevitable consequences of current [immigration]
      trends -- not the least among them diminished Jewish political power -- with
      detachment ... We Jews need to be especially sensitive to the multinational model
      this crowd (many of them Jewish) is promoting. Why? Because one person’s
      'celebration' of his own diversity, foreign ties, and the maintenance of cultural
      and religious traditions that set him apart is another’s balkanizing identity politics.
      We are not immune from the reality of multiple identities or the charge of divided
      loyalties, a classic staple of anti-Semitism, and we must recognize that our own
      patterns are easily assailed, and we need to find ways of defending them more
      effectively as the debate goes on. Much public opinion survey research undertaken
      in recent years continues to indicate that large numbers of Americans, particularly
      people of color, assert that Jews are more loyal to Israel than the United States.
      For Jews, it is at best hypocritical, and, worse, an example of an utter lack of
      self-awareness, not to recognize that we are up to our necks in this problem. This
      has been especially true once we were sufficiently accepted in the United States
      to feel confident enough to go public with our own identity politics. But this
      newfound confidence carries its own costs; people are observing us closely,
      and what they see in our behavior is not always distinct from what we loudly
      decry in others. One has to be amused, even amazed, when colleagues in the
      organized Jewish world wring their hands about black nationalism, Afrocentrism,
      or with cultural separatism in general — without considering Jewish behavioral
      parallels. Where has our vaunted Jewish self-awareness flown? I’ll confess it, at
      least: like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared
      as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for
      10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer
      camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting
      its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign
      folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration
      to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my       generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I       contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the
      superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to
      view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of
      hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than
      ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we
      could rely on no one."
[STEINLIGHT, S., OCTOBER 2001]

 
      "No other ethnic group in American history has so extensive an involvement with a foreign nation [Israel]," wrote Melvyn Urofsky in 1975, "No other nation relies upon a body of private individuals who are neither residents nor citizens of their land to underwrite a major portion of their budget. American Jews buy Israeli bonds, give generously to the United Jewish Appeal, lobby [American] government representatives to pursue pro-Israel policy, travel to Israel (where they are greeted with 'Welcome Home' signs), respond to every crisis in that part of the world, and yet maintain passionately that they are Americans first and Jews afterward." [UROFSKY, p. 1]


JEWISH TRIBAL REVIEW