|
Israel's
War Is Our War, Editorial, National Post,
April 8, 2002
[The National Post is one of the many news organizations owned
by avid pro-Israel activist Izzy Asper]
"Israel's campaign to destroy terrorist cells and weapons labs in
the West Bank has produced results: hundreds of wanted terror suspects
have been seized, as have thousands of illegal weapons and truckloads
of documents that prove the complicity of Yasser Arafat's Palestinian
Authority in the terrorist campaign that precipitated Israel's invasion
... Notwithstanding the poisonous anti-Israeli bigotry of the European
media -- bolstered as it always has been by naive faith in Mr. Arafat's
good intentions -- most Israelis believe their military campaign is every
bit as justified as the U.S.-led campaign in Afghanistan. And they are
right ... Which brings us to the Q&A with all five federal political parties
published in today's Post. Their responses to questions about Israel's
right to self-defence, the forms such self-defence may legitimately take,
and the moral distinction between terrorism and counterterrorism betray
a double-standard. Party spokespersons offer vague answers, and take cover
behind UN resolutions."
How Free Is Our So-Called Press?
Toronto Star, April 26, 2002
"There are facts, and then there is the truth. When we consider media
convergence in Canada — and, in particular, our biggest media conglomerate,
CanWest Global Communications — it is important to understand that
facts and truth are not always the same. Here's a fact: Several columns
that once appeared in CanWest Global newspapers, including one
by Stephen Kimber in the Halifax Daily News, have been killed,
either for unspecified inaccuracies, or because they challenged corporate
policy. All decisions, according to head office, have been made by local
editors. Here's the truth: In a remarkable act of integrity, Daily
News editor Bill Turpin resigned this week, but not before saying
that he killed Kimber's column after being advised by Murdoch Davis, his
CanWest boss in Winnipeg. 'I and other editors had been urged repeatedly
by Mr. Davis to get his advice on any prospective commentary that might
run contrary to Southam Publications' rapidly changing editorial policies,'
Turpin said in an unpublished letter. 'To my profound regret, I did so
in Mr. Kimber's case. Mr. Davis told me in colourful terms that publishing
the piece would be a career disaster.' Issues of editorial control raised
by his letter, and the sheer size of CanWest Global's influence
over news, have raised legitimate questions about how free our so-called
free press is. CanWest Global owns 27 daily newspapers. That's
a fact. They include the National Post and major newspapers in Ottawa
and six of 10 provincial capitals. They distribute 11.4 million copies
every week. This is dwarfed by Global's television network, which beams
itself to 94 per cent of English-speaking Canada (Source: CanWest Global).
The company's radio, film, Internet and entertainment holdings give it
unprecedented control over the information Canadians use every day ...
CanWest's corporate motto is: "If you can watch it, read it, hear it,
or download it, we want to be the source." Fair enough, but its owners
want Ottawa to help by giving them more tax money, and emasculating the
CBC. These are important public policy issues, but can we count on CanWest
to allow a full debate of the pros and cons in its newspapers? It already
orders its 14 largest papers to print identical, weekly editorials on
national issues, and forbids any dissent. We are therefore right to ask:
Do we want our newspapers edited by people who are afraid to publish strong
opinions until they are cleared with head office? Do we want what Doug
Creighton, founder of the Toronto Sun, called Wizard of Oz journalism
— with no brains, no heart and no courage? Concerns about the effects
of convergence are growing. Something must be done."
The AOL Time
Warner Black Hole,
FoxNews, April 29, 2002
" The verdict is finally in: The AOL Time Warner (AOL) merger should
not have happened. That's the message from last week's latest balance
sheet convulsion to shake what was once known reverentially in certain
parts as the House Of Luce. Specifically, the balance sheet net worth
of the largest media conglomerate on earth has now been slashed by more
than one-third in a biblical-sized tidal wave of losses, even as the man
who presided over the drowning - Mr. Gerald M. Levin - heads for
the exit door, a $1 million per year 'consulting' contract stuffed in
his briefcase. His new mission, after trading the crown jewel of the American
media for $95 billion worth of dot-com hype? To reconnect with his feminine
side and 'write poetry' as he eases into early retirement. What a colossal
disgrace, topped only by the pathetic efforts of the company's brass to
spin the fiasco - which amounts to the largest balance sheet evisceration
in American corporate history - as nothing more than a kind of accounting
hiccup that affects nothing. No, I don't think so ... Finally last week,
after more than fifteen months of bloodletting that has knocked 60 percent
off the price of the combined companies' stock, the company announced
that it was writing off $54 billion of its net worth as being completely
unsaleable and without any value whatsoever. In fact, there's more of
this certainly to come because the slide in the company's stock price
since the merger has wiped out more than $160 billion of the company's
market value, whereas last week's write-off has only thrown $54 billion
of it into the trash bin. In other words, perhaps as much as $100 billion
more could disappear before the carnage is complete."
Top
Executive at ABC Television Leaves After One Year in the Job,
New York Times, May 1, 2002
"After what numerous executives described as a long period of uncertainty
and even dysfunction at the highest management level of ABC, the network
announced yesterday that Steven M. Bornstein was stepping down
as president of ABC Television, the top executive position at the company.
The move is the second change in senior management in the last several
months at ABC, which is suffering through one of the worst television
seasons in the company's history. Stu Bloomberg, a longtime creative
executive who had been the co-chairman of ABC Entertainment, was ousted
in January."
US,
European Press Stand Divided Over Israel, Palestine,
Boston Globe, May 1, 2002
"The refugee camp in the West Bank town of Jenin, which was the site
of furious fighting between Israelis and Palestinians, is now the focus
of an equally intense battle for world opinion. It is also a classic example
of the profound differences between US and European media coverage of
the conflict in the Middle East. Much of the press in this country, while
taking note of the physical destruction after the combat, was cautious
in its treatment of Palestinian claims of a massacre. The Washington
Post reported that interviews turned up ''no evidence' of 'large-scale
massacres or executions by Israeli troops.' The New York Times
said a visit to the refugee camp showed 'more destruction than death.'
And Monday, the Globe reported that allegations of a massacre appeared
to be 'crumbling under the weight of eyewitness accounts.' Across the
Atlantic, the tone has been decidedly different. The Economist,
a British magazine, said 'evidence of the Israeli army's absolute negligence
in trying to protect civilian life is everywhere.' London's Independent
made reference to 'grisly evidence of a war crime' and led one story by
noting that 'the world finally got to see what Israel has done in the
Jenin refugee camp yesterday.' The Guardian, also based in London,
produced an April 17 story asserting that 'the outcry in the European
press over the killings of civilians in Jenin has not been echoed in US
newspapers.' These variations in style and substance reflect divergent
views not only between the European and American press but between the
two populations. A recent Pew Research Center poll indicates that by a
3-to-1 margin, Americans have more sympathy for Israel than for the Palestinians.
But the Palestinians enjoy significantly more support than Israel in Italy,
France, and Britain, the Pew researchers found, and marginally more in
Germany, a nation still riddled with guilt over the Holocaust. It is a
reality that partisans on both sides acknowledge."
Bill:
TV or Not TV?
New York Daily News, May 3, 2002
"Former President Bill Clinton has rejected a pitch from NBC to front
his own daytime talk show — but he isn't hitting the mute button on Bubba
TV just yet. He sat through a presentation by top executives from the
peacock network in California this week, and a spokeswoman said he'll
listen to other television gabfest proposals ... NBC had no comment. But
sources said NBC President Andrew Lack and NBC Entertainment President
Jeff Zucker [both Jewish] were in the meeting. Ed Wilson, head
of NBC's program syndication arm, is said to have also been involved in
the discussions. One source at the network described the meeting as informal.
'If this was to happen, it would be happening out of syndication,' an
executive said. 'It wouldn't be out of NBC News.'"
[Pridevision:
Canada's Gay TV Network]
pridevision.com
"John Levy - Chairman & CEO. Armed with an LL.B. degree from
the University of Toronto (and a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada
since 1978), John Levy has been a player on the Canadian broadcasting
scene for years. Until September, 1999, he was the President and CEO of
Cableworks, one of the first cable systems in Canada to launch
high-speed internet access over cable and considered a leader in the deployment
of digital technology. Mr. Levy successfully spearheaded new CRTC license
applications for both The Score, headline sports network, and PrideVision
TV. He is the majority shareholder in Headline Media Group Inc.,
the company that owns PrideVision TV."
Citizen
Annenberg So Long, You Rotten Bastard,
by Jack Shafer, Slate, October 2, 2002
"Obituaries for Walter H. Annenberg in the Los Angeles Times,
New York Times, and Washington Post barely scrape the festering
keratosis that was his career in crime, journalism, and politics. 'Media
Tycoon Gave Fortunes to Others,' soft-pedals the Los Angeles Times.
'Walter Annenberg, Philanthropist and Publisher, Dies at 94,' intones
the New York Times. 'Publisher, Philanthropist Walter Annenberg
Dies,' echoes the Post. I'd prefer the headline, 'Billionaire Son
of Mobster, Enemy of Journalism, and Nixon Toady Exits for Hell—Forced
To Leave Picassos and van Goghs at Metropolitan Museum1 ... [Annenberg's
father] Moe's bribery, blackmail, and mobstering career ended when
he was indicted for tax evasion in 1939. Walter, a company VP,
was indicted on charges of 'aiding and abetting.' Moe pleaded guilty,
agreeing to pay the $9.5 million in back taxes and fines. Prosecutors
offered to dismiss Walter's charges if Moe went directly
to jail, which he did. Moe served two years and died 39 days after
his release. Assuming control of his father's shattered company, Annenberg
launched the phenomenally successful Seventeen magazine in the '40s and
TV Guide in the '50s and acquired several radio and TV stations.
Annenberg habitually turned his head to the right to obscure the
disfigured ear he had been born with. His politics usually followed his
ear after his second marriage, to Leonore Cohn Rosenstiel. Like
his father, he used the Inquirer and his media empire as his bully
pulpit, punishing enemies real and imagined."
Faces Of The
Week,
Forbes, Oct. 8, 2002
"[Israeli citizen and] billionaire Haim Saban, looking to
invest his newfound wealth, is in talks to buy Muppet-maker Jim Henson
Co., at a steep discount to what Germany's EM.TV & Merchandising AG paid
for it, according to people close to the situation ... Jim Henson produces
movies, such as 'Muppets in Space,' and its world-famous creature shop
makes well-known puppets such as Miss Piggy and the Cookie Monster, and
creates special effects ... Saban, impresario of the popular and successful
children's characters 'Mighty Morphin Power Rangers,' landed a $1.4 billion
windfall last year when he and his partners sold cable station Fox Family
Worldwide ... Saban is also bidding for insolvent German media
group KirchMedia, Leo Kirch's eponymous--and insolvent--German media empire."
Larry Ellison's Golden Age; Profiteers of the Warfare State,
Chronicles Magazine, October 2002
[Jewish mogul] Larry Ellison has an idea. The relentlessly self-promoting
CEO of Oracle Corp., a Silicon Valley software company famous for its
ability to grab government contracts, envisions post-September 11 America
as a country where everyone walks around with a 'smart card.' Days after
the terrorist attacks, the opportunistic Ellison was all over the
media claiming that 'We need a national ID card with our photograph and
thumbprint digitized and embedded in the ID card.' Naturally, it would
all be backed up by an Oracle database. And, of course, he will do it
for free—at least until the first inevitable 'upgrade.' The only way to
protect ourselves from terrorists is to 'ensure that all the information
in myriad government databases was integrated into a single national file,'
says Ellison. Oh, and we should not worry about the government
intruding where it is not supposed to, because privacy is so pre-September
11: 'Well, this privacy you're concerned about is largely an illusion,'
Ellison told news anchor Hank Plante of San Francisco's KPIX-TV
shortly after September 11. 'All you have to give up is your illusions,
not any of your privacy. Right now, you can go onto the Internet and get
a credit report about your neighbor and find out where your neighbor works,
how much they [sic] earn and if they [sic] had a late mortgage payment
and tons of other information.'"
NBC
Changes Top Executive at 'Today,'
Yahoo! News (Associated Press), Oct 10, 2002
"NBC's top-rated "Today" show is replacing its top executive, Jonathan
Wald, amid reports of behind-the-scenes friction, according to an
NBC executive who spoke on the condition of anonymity. A former producer
at the competing ABC show, 'Good Morning America,' is one of the top candidates
to replace Wald. Wald, former producer of NBC's 'Nightly News,' joined
the morning show in May 2001, replacing the highly regarded Jeff Zucker,
who was promoted to president of NBC entertainment.
CBS scores
lowest grade for TV network diversity,
Yahoo! News, (from Reuters), July 17, 2002
"A multiethnic coalition gave the four major TV networks mediocre
to near-failing grades on Thursday for their efforts to boost racial diversity
on the air and behind the camera, blasting CBS as the slowest to embrace
reforms. Seeking to turn up the heat on CBS, the coalition sent letters
to board members of CBS' parent company, Viacom Inc. [Top two executives,
Sumner Redstone and Mel Karmazin, are Jewish] , and eight
of the network's leading advertisers, including General Motors Corp. and
Procter & Gamble Co. , urging them to press CBS to do more for minorities.
'We're asking corporate America to join us in a partnership to make this
happen,' said Karen Narasaki, the head of the consortium of civil rights
groups, who singled out CBS President Leslie Moonves [also Jewish]
for especially scathing criticism. 'Leslie Moonves was never that interested
in significantly increasing opportunities for Latinos, Asian Americans
and Native Americans. Now he appears to have lost interest altogether,'
she said.
Europe
Top historian attacks Hollywood over Nazis Films that glamorise the Third
Reich distort children's view of the past,
Independent (UK), October 13, 2002
"Antony Beevor, the distinguished military historian and best-selling
author of Stalingrad, has warned that Hollywood war movies are so historically
inaccurate they could create a new generation of Nazi sympathisers. He
believes that 'true story' war films such as U-571 and Enemy at the Gate
have made the Third Reich dangerously appealing. Alienated young men could
even sympathise with the concentration camp commandant in an openly anti-Nazi
film like Schindler's List ... Fellow historians David Starkey from Fitzwilliam
College, Cambridge and Niall Ferguson from Jesus College, Oxford told
the conference which took place behind closed doors at Dartington Hall
in Devon ñ that school history is in now in 'crisis'. According to Professor
Ferguson, sixth-formers applying to university know little of the past
aside from Hitler and Stalin, thanks to the dominance of the Second World
War in the national curriculum, GCSE and A-level courses - which he said
should be scrapped. But his suggestion that the Holocaust was too complex
an issue to be studied in detail by teenagers met with a hostile reaction
from the Board of Deputies of British Jews. 'The lessons of the Holocaust
are easily absorbed by children of 13,' said the Board's senior vice president
Henry Grunwald QC. 'There is still
too much intolerance, bigotry and prejudice in our society to allow the
industrialised murder of millions of people to be glossed over.'"
Mitchell
slates music industry,
BBC News, October 15, 2002
"Veteran singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell has hit out at the music
industry, saying she is 'ashamed' to be part of it. The 58-year-old folk
rock artist, who releases her new album Travelogue next month, told American
magazine Rolling Stone that she may stop recording altogether.
'I just think it's a cesspool,' Mitchell said of the music business ...
'It's tragic what MTV has done to the world,' Mitchell said ... The musician,
once described by her friend David Crosby as being 'about as humble as
Mussolini,' has also attacked David Geffen, the head of her former
label Geffen Records. She accused him of never paying her any royalties."
[Who runs the "music industry," and
always has? Do a "Find" search of "Kenneth Kanter"
at this link-page; this name starts the music section]
Dell
trumps HP for top PC spot,
Earthlink (from Associated Press), October
17, 2002,
"Dell Computer [founded and headed by Jewish mogul Michael
Dell] has surpassed Hewlett-Packard to take the lead position
in the global PC market, according to a new survey by research firm IDC.
Based on unit shipments during the third quarter, the direct PC seller
just topped its rival with 16 percent of the global market, compared with
HP's 15.5 percent, according to IDC analyst Roger Kay."
Maxwell Killed
by Mossad: New Book,
New York Post, October 25, 2002
"'Robert Maxwell, Israel's Superspy,' to be published in December
by Carroll and Graf, claims Mossad decided to get rid of Maxwell because
he was threatening to expose his knowledge of Israeli secrets unless he
received Israeli help in propping up his failing businesses. Maxwell's
sudden death at sea in November 1991 off the Canary Islands brought about
the collapse of his worldwide publishing empire and triggered theories
ranging from suicide, murder or accident. Maxwell - who owned the Daily
News at the time - disappeared overboard just as the complex web of
financial deals keeping his businesses afloat was beginning to unravel
and a few weeks after U.S. investigative journalist Seymour Hersh
published a book claiming Maxwell had close ties with the Israeli secret
services. The new book, by British thriller writer Gordon Thomas and Irish
journalist Martin Dillon, is based on interviews with former Mossad agents
and chiefs."
Winona Jury Shocker,
Slate, October 28, 2002
"A Jury of Her Peers: How dumb were prosecutors to let Peter Guber,
former head of Sony Pictures, on to the Winona Ryder [both Guber
and Ryder, originally Horowitz, are Jewish] shoplifting
jury? They must not have read Nancy Griffin and Kim Masters' Hit and
Run: How Jon Peters and Peter Guber Took Sony for a Ride in Hollywood.
If the lawyers in the D.A.'s office do get hold of a copy, they perhaps
should pay special attention to the pages cited in the index entry: 'Guber/Peters
... and greed, 9, 108, 109, 119, 142, 148.' Can the prosecutors seriously
think Guber is someone who's about to get all moralistic over a
few missing hats and hair bands? ... "
On Eve
Of Merger, Comcast Says It Can Play,
Forbes, October 29, 2002
"Comcast stands out as a port of sanity in a sea of mad overbuilding
and overreaching. Yesterday, on the eve of closing its massive $46 billion
acquisition of AT&T Broadband from AT&T, the company reported
a quarterly profit of $75.6 million, or eight cents a share ... The QVC
home shopping network, the least glamorous side of Comcast's business,
posted a 13% increase in revenue, to $1.01 billion. Beyond QVC,
Comcast owns E! Networks, Comcast-Spectacor, the
Golf Channel and other channels. Advertising revenue increased
nearly 12% to $93.2 million, reflecting in part a stronger local ad market.
'As we prepare to complete the merger with AT&T Broadband in the fourth
quarter, we are building from a position of strength. Each of our businesses
are financially and operationally strong and we have a solid balance sheet
and liquidity position to support our growth,' [Jewish mogul] Brian
Roberts, Comcast president, said in a prepared statement. As
of today, Comcast is the third-largest U.S. cable company. After
it merges with AT&T Broadband, which has seen its subscriber rate
declining, it will be the largest."
Paint It Black,
by Max Hastings, Toronto Globe and Mail,
October 19, 2002
Focus, p. F3
"For nine years as editor of the [British] Daily Telegraph,
Max Hastings had to navigate the politics and personal passions of the
paper's Canadian-born proprietor. In this exclusive excerpt from his compelling
new book [An Inside Story, by Max Hastings (Macmillan, 2002), he offers
an inside look at how [non-Jewish media mogul] Conrad Black does business
...As the years went by, [Black] also developed increasingly strong views
on the Middle East question, and thus on our coverage of it. Especially
after his purchase of the Jerusalem Post, Conrad showed himself
an energetic supporter of the Israeli cause against that of the Palestinians.
Conrad and I had several sharp exchanges, after pieces appeared in the
Telegraph which he deemed anti-Israel or even anti-Semitic. One
of Conrad's favourite terms of approbation was to describe a friend or
colleague as 'giving me a high comfort level.' Conversely, when one of
our writers erred in his eyes, I knew it was time to hoist storm signals
when the chairman declared - with only a nod toward irony or conscious
extravagance - that 'this snivelling product of some pinko journalism
school administered by the John Pilger/Christopher Hitchens Trust for
the propagation of liberal mendacity does not give me a high comfort level,
Max.' It was ironic, therefore, when one of the major rows of our time
together descended on Conrad because he was accused of publishing anti-Semitic
material in one of his own organs. In November, 1994, a Los Angeles 'stringer'
for the Telegraph, William Cash, wrote a piece for The Spectator
- which the Telegraph had purchased from Algy Cluff in 1991 - suggesting
that Hollywood was a Jewish town. In the wake of its publication, the
roof fell in. A long roll-call of Hollywood luminaries headed by Tom Cruise,
Steven Spielberg, Barbra Streisand and Kevin Costner wrote letters to
Conrad and an open letter to The Spectator, and delivered diatribes
to anyone who would listen, denouncing the Cash piece as a disgraceful
piece of journalism. 'We have seen it all before, from the Inquisition
in 13th-century Spain to the Holocaust of 20th-century Germany,' ran one
of the less hyperbolic passages of their Spectator letter. 'When, to the
editors of magazines like the Spectator, racist cant becomes indistinguishable
from thoughtful commentary, it should sound a loud warning that we have
not progessed so far after all.' I was sitting in Conrad's office while
he took a call from an enraged Jack Valenti, speaking on behalf of the
Hollywood Motion Picture Association, about the piece. They were demanding
space not only in the Spectator, but also in the Daily Telegraph,
to denounce the author. It was one of the few moments in my time with
Conrad when I saw him look seriously rattled. I did not think the Cash
piece represented memorable - perhaps not even tasteful - journalism,
but nor did I believe that it deserved the ludicrous overreaction of the
Hollywood community. Their demands, especially for space in the Telegraph,
seemed absurd. I urged that they should be given a right of reply in The
Spectator, but otherwise told to take a running jump.' Conrad said:
'You don't understand, Max. My entire interests in the United States and
internationally could be seriously damaged by this.' The complaints eventually
subsided. So too did the row, as I was growing to understand that all
rows eventually do. [Note: the assertions by William Cash in The Spectator
are, of course, true -- see here for more about
the Cash incident, and a long, documented investigation about Jewish hegemony
in Hollywood]
'Let's talk about anything
but our movie.'An intimate conversation about spirituality and Judaism
with Hollywood heavyweights David Levien and Brian Koppelman,
Jewsweek, October 2002
"From the moment the door closes behind me, I know this interview
is going to be different. Film director Brian Koppelman, sporting
a 'Hoops is religion' t-shirt, escorts me into his suite at the swank
Ritz Carlton hotel in midtown Atlanta. Seated at the table, relaxed and
drinking a cup of coffee, is his writing/directing partner David Levien.
We all sit down and this is the first thing Koppelman says: 'Jewsweek
-- now that's a cool name.' The two Hollywood heavyweights, both Jewish,
are in town to promote their new film, Knockaround Guys, but it
seems like that's the last thing they want to talk about. 'Is there a
large Jewish population here?' Levien asks, genuinely interested.
A short game of Jewish geography ensues. 'Are you married? Did you grow
up religious?' Koppelman asks me. And here I thought I was interviewing
them. It seems they've spent the last 24 hours discussing their film,
a mob comedy starring A-list stars Dennis Hooper, John Malkovich, and
Vin Diesel, cast as perhaps the strongest looking man ever to sport a
Star of David tattoo. When a fellow Jew walks into the room, it seems,
the last thing they want to do is self-promotion. Koppelman and
Levien are proving a point that becomes clear over the next hour:
They have their priorities in order. While making movies is how they make
a living, it's being Jewish that dictates their life. 'It's a real part
of our lives,' Levien says, leaning back in his chair. 'It shapes
who you are' ... I tell them about a recent Time magazine article
that said that 'show business is a homophobic, anti-Semitic industry dominated
by homosexuals and Jews.' I ask if they encounter a lot of self-hating
Jews in their business. 'Being a Jew in Hollywood, you're not looked at
as scant in any way,' Levien says. 'It's not a handicap. Maybe it's even
a help in some ways.'"
Doers
and doings in business, entertainment and technology: Michael Eisner says
there's no broader strategy with Microsoft,
Forbes, October 24, 2002
"[Jewish mogul] Michael Eisner's Walt Disney and Microsoft's
MSN [Microsoft is headed today by Jewish mogul Steve Ballmer] announced
they are banding together to launch a family-friendly Internet service
in a bid to challenge embattled industry leader America Online, a unit
of AOL Time Warner. The new service will offer items such as parental
controls and new start-up pages for kids that are filled with Disney characters
like Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck, as well as a separate start page for
adults, the companies said in a statement."
The
cat's whiskers,
Guardian (UK), February 3, 2002
"As last week's figures show, BBC radio is now drawing in an as many
listeners as it ever has, and it's all down to Jenny Abramsky ...
But Abramsky is something more than a competent technician. She is credited
with a revival in the fortunes of British radio, a medium that doom-mongers
insisted 25 years ago might not survive into the new millennium ... Abramsky
is untypical of BBC managers, many of whom until recently came from the
mould of Lord Reith. She was educated at Holland Park Comprehensive. One
of her grandfathers was a rabbi in Moscow, imprisoned by Stalin. Her father,
Chimen, was a professor of Jewish studies. Her mother, Miriam,
a leading social worker and former communist, was in Brick Lane during
Oswald Mosley's fascist marches ... After a university education at East
Anglia, Abramsky landed a coveted place as a BBC radio trainee
in 1969. In those days, it was considered a Rolls-Royce career opening.
'We just thought it was an incredible privilege to do a job like that
and get paid for it,' said Alan Yentob, now in charge of drama
and entertainment of the BBC, who joined at the same time ... Jonathan
Ross now has an audience of three million younger people on a Saturday
morning and 12.3 million people tune in every week."
What's Really Going
on In Hollywood,
Film Industry Reform Movement, 1997
[A book-length examination of Hollywood discrimination by John Cones]
"This book is dedicated to all of the African Americans, Hispanic/Latinos,
Native Americans, Asian Americans, German Americans, Italian Americans,
women, gays/lesbians, Christians, Muslims, Arabs and Arab-Americans, White
Southerners and others who have been victimized by Hollywood employment
discrimination and patterns of bias on the screen for some 100 years ...
Hollywood is, in fact, controlled by a small group of Jewish males of
European heritage, who are politically liberal and not very religious;
a narrowly-defined group that is either making the kinds of movies its
members want to see, and sometimes producing movies it is being pressured
into making by various segments of the broader so-called 'Jewish community'".
Who Really Controls
Hollywood,
by John W. Cones, Film Industry Reform Movement
[Cones has researched the ethnicity of the power hierarchy of Hollywood.
He lists individuals, cites bibliographic sources about their ethnicity,
and evidences that Jews overwhelmingly dominate the Hollywood power structure]
American Jews and
the Efforts to Reform Motion Pictures, 1933-35,
by Felicia Herman, American Jewish Archives
Jounral,
http://huc.edu/aja/Article-FeliciaHerman.pdf
"This concern for the public image of American Jews has always been
an essential component of the American Jewish releationship to the film
industry. Throughout the twentieth century, various elements of the American
Jewish community sought to influence the content and message of American
motion pictures ... The Jewish relationship to the film industry is a
particularly valuable area in which to understand the Jewish quest for
status and concern for appearances, for here Jews were forced to articulate
quite concretely -- indeed, even visually -- the way they wanted to be
perceived by the outside world ... Between 1930 and 1934, American debates
over film content reached a fevered pitch, and would-be film reformers
-- primarily Protestant and Catholic clergy and lay leaders -- accused
the motion picture industry of intentionally corrupting the morals of
the film audiences by foisting a seemingly endless stream of salacious
motion pictures on the American people. Because 'Hollywood' had long been
synonymous in many film reformers minds with 'Jews,' attacks on the industry
in this period often revealed disturbing, antsemitic undertones. Drawing
on a rhetoric that stretched back for at least two decades -- and on a
much older antisemitic theme associating Jews with sexual immorality --
many reformers argued that immoral films were the result of the inherent
immorality of the Jews who made them."
Asper's
charges of media bias 'bizarre,'
Globe and Mail (Toronto),by Doug Saunders,
November 1, 2002
"After a long, angry speech by Winnipeg media mogul Izzy Asper,
which accused most of the world's media of being insufficiently pro-Israeli
and implied that reporters are anti-Semitic, bewildered journalists yesterday
struggled to respond. Mr. Asper's Wednesday night speech, which
was reprinted prominently in his city papers and the National Post,
effectively positioned Mr. Asper and his newspapers to the far right of
most of the world's major media. As with speeches he delivered last month
with former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, it repeated
the Israeli Likud party's conservative and aggressively anti-Arab views.
This time, though, he named names, accusing the CBC, The New York Times,
The Washington Post, the Associated Press and Reuters wire services, ABC,
CBS, NBC, CNN, BBC, the British Guardian, Independent, Evening Standard
and Daily Mirror newspapers, as well as ITV and Sky News networks, and
other outlets of being 'lazy, or sloppy, or stupid . . . [or] plain and
simple, biased or anti-Semitic.' He singled out the CBC and its former
Middle East reporter Neil MacDonald, accusing them of providing 'the most
slanted and biased information' and of routinely practising 'dishonest
reporting.' In particular, he demanded that reporters in the Mideast,
such as Mr. Macdonald, refer to all Palestinian militants as 'terrorists.'
Tony Burman, head of the CBC-TV news division, said yesterday that he
considered Mr. Asper's opinions 'bizarre,' and that he would be demanding
space to respond to the accusations in the Asper-owned papers. 'To suggest
that most of the world's media are involved in a conspiracy against Israel,
it's just a totally extreme conception on Asper's part.' ... 'There is
something profoundly ironic about being told off about media bias by someone
like Izzy Asper,' said Mr. Burman, apparently referring to Mr. Asper's
former practice of forcing his city papers to print company-written editorials
that expressed the owner's views."
The Secret History
of Television Corporate power, patent law, and lone inventors,
Reason, November 2002
"Here’s a story for you. Inspiration strikes a Mormon farmboy, the
improbably named Philo T. Farnsworth, as he plows a potato field in Idaho.
Armed with his new insight, he moves to L.A., finds investors and assistants,
and on a shoestring invents television. A corporate giant tries to steal
his creation, and a long, expensive legal fight ensues. Farnsworth wins
the battle but loses the war, successfully defending his claim to the
patent but nonetheless watching most of the credit -- and most of the
profits -- accrue to the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) and its self-aggrandizing
chief, [Jewish mogul of RCA and NBC] David Sarnoff. Farnsworth
spends his last years chasing the dream of nuclear fusion, then dies poor,
depressed, and virtually forgotten. It’s not a bad tale. Drain out the
melodrama and sprinkle in some nuance, and you’ll find it’s actually true.
The saga of Philo Farnsworth may have a special resonance in the dot-bust
era, as battles rage over intellectual property and corporate turpitude
dominates the headlines. Or perhaps it’s just a coincidence that two books
about Farnsworth have been published this year: Evan Schwartz’s The
Last Lone Inventor: A Tale of Genius, Deceit, and the Birth of Television
(HarperCollins) and Daniel Stashower’s The Boy Genius and the Mogul:
The Untold Story of Television (Broadway)."
The Overachievers:
Viacom's Clear Signal,
Forbes, November 5, 2002
"In a year when media companies large and small have been absolutely
pummeled by cutbacks in advertising, Viacom is an amazing anomaly.
The company, led by Chairman and Chief Executive Sumner Redstone
[born Murray Rothstein], has seen sales grow for all of its divisions
... But one of the reasons Viacom has prospered is that it has little
exposure to areas where advertising has been hit the hardest--print publications
and on the Web. Rather, Viacom has significant television assets
that include the CBS network, which is pulling in big audiences
with some of its prime-time shows like Everybody Loves Raymond
and Survivor. Its cable networks include MTV and the hugely
successful reality show The Osbournes and Nickelodeon, whose
children's cartoon show SpongeBob SquarePants is emerging as a
cultural phenomenon. Viacom's other television properties include UPN,
Black Entertainment Television and TV Land, all of which
have relatively small but growing audiences. The other gem in Viacom's
gold mine is Blockbuster Entertainment , of which it owns 81% ...
Next up, Redstone and President Mel Karmazin [also Jewish]
say they are on the prowl for cable networks. The Comedy Channel,
which Viacom already half owns--AOL Time Warner owns the
other half--and the Discovery Channel have been mentioned as potential
targets."
The Berman Bill The
representative from Hollywood wants to create an online corporate vigilante
posse to wipe out peer-to-peer file sharing,
Digital Speech Project
"On 25 July 2002, US Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) introduced
a bill to allow copyright holders to engage in otherwise illegal network
vandalism against P2P network users that share copyrighted materials.
The copyright holders (such as record companies) would be empowered to
act as prosecutor, judge, and jury, and to use familiar cracker tactics
such as spoofing and interdiction (also known as 'distributed denial of
service') ... Representative Berman's district includes North Hollywood,
San Fernando, and surrounding areas near Los Angeles. This area is home
to many of the most influential (and wealthy) figures of the movie industry.
Furthermore, if you examine the corporate affiliation of Berman's donors,
you'll find that the largest group represents Disney, with the top ten
including media giants AOL Time Warner, Vivendi Universal, Viacom, Dreamworks,
and Sony. Clearly Berman is representing both his district and his donors
by introducing a bill that would give media companies the power of law
enforcement."
Knight on the wrong
horse,
Arab News (Saudi Arabia), November 13, 2002
"The US entertainment industry and media (which we all know is not,
cannot be, controlled by Zionists and pro-Zionists — the Aarons
to Zimmermans are surely coincidence) stereotype and vilify Arabs
and Muslims day-in, day-out, in movies, books, mainstream publications
and talk shows, with no regard to history, actuality, or factuality. Spin
this way, spin that way, distort, convolute, improvise, bastardize, it’s
all there. Let’s not even get into what is said and portrayed in the darling
ally, the only regional democracy of democracies, about their neighbors.
Heck, they teach their own kids that there was nobody around a few decades
ago, right as they sit in the very usurped homes of the ghost people who
purportedly were never there. But, then, the Palestinians took a different
evolutionary approach. They didn’t evolve the way the rest of us did.
It seems that they metamorphose directly from cells in the soil. Darn!
Darwin, where art thou? Where do you get off trying to smother the freedom
of speech, expression, opinion, and artistic work of a local TV production,
whether factual or fictional, while decades-worth of productions demonizing,
stereotyping and vilifying “Red Injuns,” “Japs,” “Gerries,” “Vietcong,”
“Arab Shieks” and on, and on, live in the memories of millions and are
on video shelves for the renting? And please don’t give us the sob story
about the Elders of the Protocols of Zion being used as the basis for
pogroms and the Holocaust, not when those very events (sad as they were,
and promoting of egalitarianism as they should have been) were the pretexts
for repeat brutality, eviction, murder, plunder, and apartheid by the
Zionists against Palestinians. By perpetuating injustices done to them,
Zionists have unwittingly (perhaps not) legitimized original sin. No one
is surprised that the Israelis would object to this work. They’re prone
to barking. Besides, if they object to something, there’s got to be at
least some right in it. But for the US State Department to take it up
on their behalf? Especially when it flies in the face of the very freedoms
the US purportedly stands for? ... It’s no surprise when Zionists attempt
to portray Arabs or Muslims as being 'anti-Semitic.'"
Canada:
CanWest 'muzzles' staff, Corporate Censorship, CanWest-owned papers across
Canada have pulled and censored not only any articles which criticise
the corporation, but also those that simply fail to toe its line, the
principal tenets of which are support for Israel and for the government
of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien,
Index on Censorship, April 2002
"Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) published
a report on 15 April giving a balanced but firm view of the controversy
surrounding allegations of corporate censorship in the CanWest Global
media conglomerate. The report made it clear that 'freedom of expression
includes the right of proprietors of news organisations to publish what
they want in the media they own', but condemned CanWest for trying
to 'muzzle its employees'. Since absorbing Hollinger, in the largest
media take-over deal in Canadian history, the corporation, run by the
Asper family, owns over 130 newspapers in Canada, including 14
major metropolitan dailies and a 50% stake in one of the country's largest
national papers, the National Post. CanWest Global also
has a television network in Canada and media interests in Ireland, Australia
and New Zealand. CanWest-owned papers across Canada have pulled
and censored not only any articles which criticise the corporation, but
also those that simply fail to toe its line, the principal tenets of which
are support for Israel and for the government of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien.
CanWest's contempt for editorial independence was formally expressed
in December 2001, when it introduced a policy of imposing three centrally-produced
editorials a week on all its major publications, through its subsidiary,
Southam newspapers ...In January, Halifax Daily News columnist
Stephen Kimber resigned (after fifteen years on the paper) when his column
criticising CanWest was spiked. Two colleagues followed suit after
they were not permitted to report on the resignation. Bill Marsden, an
investigative reporter for the Montreal Gazette, has been monitoring
CanWest's interference and directives: 'They do not want to see
any criticism of Israel. We do not run in our newspaper op-ed pieces that
express criticism of Israel and what it is doing in the Middle East. We
even had an incident where a fellow, a professor wrote an op-ed piece
for us criticising the anti-terrorism law and elements of civil rights.
Now that professor happens to be a Muslim and happens to have an Arab
name. We got a call from headquarters demanding to know why we had printed
this.' Various international Press organisation have condemned CanWest's
behaviour. According to Robert Cribb, president of the Canadian Association
of Journalists, there have been many other cases of journalists on
CanWest papers getting into trouble. He warned though that the
real worry is the self-censorship that ensues: 'It's not the four or five
we've heard about, it's about the dozens of journalists who self-censor
as a result of this very public policy.' The management of CanWest
remained defiant. 'I can say to our critics and to the bleeding hearts
of the journalist community that it's the end of the world as they know
it, and I feel fine,' declared David Asper, publications committee
chairman, gleefully misquoting the REM song. The CJFE report said that
media companies should defend freedom of expression because they are among
its chief beneficiaries, and urged CanWest to cancel all pending
disciplinary action against its employees, and to invite those who have
left their posts to return to them. It also called for an Independent
government enquiry look into the potential impact on free expression of
media ownership concentration." [The Canadian Journalists for
Free Expression Report about Asper and CanWest is here.
A
New Cable Giant. AT&T Comcast will be unprecedented in size and influence--but
must win over skeptical investors and sell unproven services, Business
Week, November 18, 2002
"You would never know that [Jewish mogul] Brian L. Roberts
was about to be catapulted into the media elite. In mid-November, his
company, cable operator Comcast Corp., is expected to close its
$54 billion acquisition of AT&T Broadband, the biggest deal in
the industry since the AOL Time Warner (AOL ) merger in 2001 ...
Roberts practically grew up in the cable business (his father,
Ralph, founded Comcast in 1963) and has a reputation as
one of the best operators and toughest negotiators around, but he has
never faced a challenge like this. In fact, no one in the industry has.
Roberts' new company, AT&T Comcast Corp., will be unprecedented
in size and influence. Before the merger, he could count a respectable
8.5 million customers in four major cities. Now, 21 million customers
in 17 of the top 20 cities will be hooked up to his systems. That's nearly
twice as many as the next biggest operator, Time Warner Cable.
Put another way, it's in one of every five homes in America that has a
television. AT&T Comcast could bring in some $24 billion in 2003,
more than Time Warner and Charter Communications combined
... Even more daunting for Roberts is that AT&T Comcast will be
so big that it is certain to shift the dynamic of power in the media business.
Roberts, who likes to say his favorite TV show is the midnight
special on his own QVC shopping channel, will effectively be the nation's
top entertainment gatekeeper. Think about it: Nobody will have more control
over which TV channels, Internet services, and movies are piped into U.S.
homes--not News Corp.'s Rupert Murdoch, not Sumner Redstone
at Viacom Inc. Right from the start, Roberts will have the clout
to do what cable executives have wanted to do for years: dictate what
shows will reach a mass audience and at what price ... Consumer advocates,
though, worry about how thoroughly Roberts will dominate the industry.
'AT&T Comcast will be the single most powerful media company in
the U.S.,' says Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for
Digital Democracy, a public-interest group that is a staunch critic of
the Comcast-AT&T deal. 'They will most certainly determine everyone's
digital destiny' ... [Roberts has] bought big stakes in several cable
channels, including QVC Inc. and E! Entertainment Television,
as well as two Philadelphia sports teams (not for vanity, either--the
unassuming Roberts has only met the 76ers All-Star point guard Allen Iverson
twice in six years) ... Even Brian's mother, Suzanne, an
actress, has a weekly half-hour show about 'living well' that airs on
a Comcast channel ... At a recent industry dinner honoring Roberts, AOL
Time Warner's Parsons said his ascension to the head of Comcast was his
birthright: 'The crown prince has assumed the throne.' Then he joked that
the mohel at Roberts' bris [the traditional Jewish circumcision] had used
cable splicers."
The one
serious subject Hollywood doesn't avoid More than 170 films about the
Holocaust have been made since 1989. Six more are out this fall,
Christian Science Monitor, November 22, 2002
"At a time when fantasies, comedies, and frivolous fare dominate
the movie marketplace, films on serious subjects often seem like an endangered
cultural species. Yet one utterly serious event - arguably the gravest
of the past century - retains strong relevance for filmmakers and audiences.
This is the Holocaust, with the evidence it contained of a bestial inhumanity
lurking at the heart of contemporary life. One sign of ongoing interest
in Holocaust films is the arrival of four new movies on the subject in
American theaters during the next two months: 1The Pianist' and 'Amen'
dramatize true experiences; 'Max' is historical fiction; and 'Blind Spot
- Hitler's Secretary' is a documentary. Another sign is the publication
of Annette Insdorf's definitive book 'Indelible Shadows: Film and the
Holocaust' in a new edition next month. The author discusses no fewer
than 170 films that have been made or rediscovered since the last edition
in 1989. 'I could have devoted a whole new book to the recent titles alone,"
said Ms. Insdorf in a recent interview ... Hollywood began tackling the
subject in earnest with Stanley Kramer's epic 'Judgment at Nuremberg'
in 1961, and Steven Spielberg renewed its impact for a new generation
with 'Schindler's List' in 1993, earning his first Oscar for best director.
Filmmakers have taken on Holocaust themes for many reasons, including
personal ties to the subject or a wish to explore their own Jewish roots
... 'Movies made during or just after the war often show a belief in interfaith
solidarity,' she observes. By contrast, Holocaust movies of the '50s and
'60s usually focus 'on Jewish victims and Nazi villains, establishing
basic facts of deportation and extermination.' Later releases like 'Schindler's
List' tend to concentrate on 'resistance and rescue,' in Insdorf's words."
Robert
Maxwell Was a Mossad Spy. New claim on tycoon's mystery death,
By Gordon Thomas And Martin Dillon, Mirror,
(UK), Decemer 5, 2002
[Robert Maxwell, born Ludwig Hoch, was a Jewish immigrant
from Czecheslovakia to Great Britain]
"Eleven years after former Daily Mirror owner Robert Maxwell
plunged from his luxury yacht to a watery grave, his death still arouses
intense interest. Many different theories have circulated about what really
happened on board the Lady Ghislaine that night in May 1991. Some believe
the 67-year-old tycoon simply slipped into the sea, perhaps after a few
drinks. Others think Maxwell took his own life amid increasing troubles
in his business empire - after his death investigators discovered he had
been secretly diverting millions of pounds from two of his companies and
from employee pension funds in an effort to keep solvent. But now, after
two and a half years of investigative journalism, we believe we have unearthed
the true story of Maxwell's death and can reveal how he was murdered by
the Israeli secret service, Mossad. Our work, supported by documents,
including FBI reports and secret intelligence files from behind the Iron
Curtain, shows Maxwell had worked as a secret super spy for Mossad for
six years. The Czech-born millionaire and former Labour MP died the way
he had lived - threatening. He had threatened his wife. Threatened his
children. Threatened the staff of this newspaper. But finally he issued
one threat too many - he threatened Mossad. He told them that unless they
gave him £400million to save his crumbling empire, he would expose all
he had done for them. In that time, he had free access to Margaret Thatcher's
Downing Street, to Ronald Reagan's White House, to the Kremlin and to
the corridors of power throughout Europe. On top of that he had built
himself a position of power within the crime families of eastern Europe,
teaching them how to funnel their vast wealth from drugs, arms smuggling
and prostitution to banks in safe havens around the globe. MAXWELL passed
on all the secrets he learned to Mossad in Tel Aviv. In turn, they tolerated
his excesses, vanities and insatiable appetite for a luxurious lifestyle
and women. He told his controllers who they should target and how they
should do it. He appointed himself as Israel's unofficial ambassador to
the Soviet Bloc. Mossad saw the advantage in that. Having learned many
of the key secrets of the Soviet empire, Maxwell was given his greatest
chance to be a super spy. Mossad had stolen from America the most important
piece of software in the US arsenal. Maxwell was given the job of marketing
the stolen software, called Promis. Mossad had reconstructed the software
and inserted into it a device which enabled them to track the use any
purchaser made of the it. Sitting in Israel, Mossad would know exactly
what was going on inside all the intelligence services that bought it.
In all, Maxwell sold it to 42 countries, including China and Soviet Bloc
nations. But his greatest triumph was selling it to Los Alamos, the very
heart of the US nuclear defence system. The more successful Maxwell became
the more risks he took and the more dangerous he was to Mossad. At the
same time, the very public side of Maxwell, who then owned 400 companies,
began to unwind ... The group of Mossad plotters sensed, like Solomon,
he could bring their temple tumbling down and cause incalculable harm
to Israel."
Who Owns What,
Columbia Journalism Review
[Lists of which media companies own which others]
"Media companies continue to grow, and a shrinking number of them
shape what we view and read. What does that mean for journalists -- and
for the nation?"
CURRENTS: POLITICS Can Bloomberg Cover Bloomberg?,
Columbia Journalism Review, January-February
2002
"When the owner of Bloomberg News [Michael Bloomberg]
ran for New York City mayor [an election he won], the press reported on
the billionaire candidate's unorthodox remarks, his daily calls to his
ninety-two-year-old mother, and the $69 million he spent on the campaign.
But Bloomberg News ran tepid summaries of these stories, penned
by reporters not on Mike Bloomberg's payroll ... On January 1, this short-term
ethical dilemma became a way of life. Bloomberg News, which in
2000 assembled a fourteen-member team to cover general New York news,
has to figure out how to cover the boss ... 'Are people going to accept
that we're not an agent of Mike Bloomberg?' asks one Bloomberg journalist.
"After the election a lot of people made jokes like 'Will you be the new
press secretary?' It was bothering me. I began to fear that my credibility
was going to go down the tubes. These things really have not been addressed'
...Bloomberg News hired Tom Goldstein, dean of the Columbia
School of Journalism and former press secretary of Mayor Ed Koch,
as arbiter ... The staff, like much of the city, was surprised that Bloomberg
won. He had never held office, and he ran as a Republican in a city that
is five-to-one Democratic. City hall reporter Henry Goldman, a
Bloomberg employee since 1999 who once covered New York for The Philadelphia
Inquirer, has grown tired of the mock post-election 'congratulations.'
He says he is just eager to get back to the business of covering a mayor,
and is confident he can do so fairly. 'I told Bloomberg a long time ago,
'I'm not related to you. I don't owe you anything except honesty and fairness,'"
says Goldman. 'I don't feel that I have a conflict.'"
Canada:
CanWest 'muzzles' staff, Corporate Censorship, CanWest-owned papers across
Canada have pulled and censored not only any articles which criticise
the corporation, but also those that simply fail to toe its line, the
principal tenets of which are support for Israel and for the government
of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien,
Index on Censorship, April 2002
"Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE) published
a report on 15 April giving a balanced but firm view of the controversy
surrounding allegations of corporate censorship in the CanWest Global
media conglomerate. The report made it clear that 'freedom of expression
includes the right of proprietors of news organisations to publish what
they want in the media they own', but condemned CanWest for trying
to 'muzzle its employees'. Since absorbing Hollinger, in the largest
media take-over deal in Canadian history, the corporation, run by the
Asper family, owns over 130 newspapers in Canada, including 14
major metropolitan dailies and a 50% stake in one of the country's largest
national papers, the National Post. CanWest Global also
has a television network in Canada and media interests in Ireland, Australia
and New Zealand. CanWest-owned papers across Canada have pulled
and censored not only any articles which criticise the corporation, but
also those that simply fail to toe its line, the principal tenets of which
are support for Israel and for the government of Prime Minister Jean Chrétien.
CanWest's contempt for editorial independence was formally expressed
in December 2001, when it introduced a policy of imposing three centrally-produced
editorials a week on all its major publications, through its subsidiary,
Southam newspapers ...In January, Halifax Daily News columnist
Stephen Kimber resigned (after fifteen years on the paper) when his column
criticising CanWest was spiked. Two colleagues followed suit after
they were not permitted to report on the resignation. Bill Marsden, an
investigative reporter for the Montreal Gazette, has been monitoring
CanWest's interference and directives: 'They do not want to see
any criticism of Israel. We do not run in our newspaper op-ed pieces that
express criticism of Israel and what it is doing in the Middle East. We
even had an incident where a fellow, a professor wrote an op-ed piece
for us criticising the anti-terrorism law and elements of civil rights.
Now that professor happens to be a Muslim and happens to have an Arab
name. We got a call from headquarters demanding to know why we had printed
this.' Various international Press organisation have condemned CanWest's
behaviour. According to Robert Cribb, president of the Canadian Association
of Journalists, there have been many other cases of journalists on
CanWest papers getting into trouble. He warned though that the
real worry is the self-censorship that ensues: 'It's not the four or five
we've heard about, it's about the dozens of journalists who self-censor
as a result of this very public policy.' The management of CanWest
remained defiant. 'I can say to our critics and to the bleeding hearts
of the journalist community that it's the end of the world as they know
it, and I feel fine,' declared David Asper, publications committee
chairman, gleefully misquoting the REM song. The CJFE report said that
media companies should defend freedom of expression because they are among
its chief beneficiaries, and urged CanWest to cancel all pending
disciplinary action against its employees, and to invite those who have
left their posts to return to them. It also called for an Independent
government enquiry look into the potential impact on free expression of
media ownership concentration." [The Canadian Journalists for
Free Expression Report about Asper and CanWest is here.
Alleged
Jewish 'Control' of the American Motion Picture Industry,
Anti-Defamation League
"For the better part of this century, anti-Semites have alleged that
American Jews have conspired with their co-religionists to 'control' the
motion picture industry in the United States. The assertion that Jews
'control' Hollywood, the media, banking and finance, among other things
... As late as 1921, [Henry Ford's] the Dearborn Independent still proclaimed:
'The motion picture influence of the United States -- and Canada -- is
exclusively under the control, moral and financial, of the Jewish manipulators
of the public mind.' The publication asserted that 'the picture business,
on its commercial side, is Jewish through and through' and that 'the American
Public is as helpless against the films as it is against any other exaggerated
expression of Jewish power' ... To the present day, anti-Semites have
continued to allege that Jews are engaged in a conspiracy to 'control'
Hollywood ... Even a reputable British magazine in 1994 revived the stereotype
of Hollywood in which an alleged 'Jewish cabal' controls the industry.
The article, in The Spectator, authored by William Cash, a Hollywood
correspondent for the conservative British newspaper The Daily Telegraph,
contended that Jews have created an 'invidious and protective culture'
that denies employment to non-Jews ... In an essay headed 'Who Says Jews
Control Hollywood?' published in the February/March 1995 issue of Midstream
magazine, Steven G. Kellman, a professor at the University of Texas
in San Antonio, wrote: 'Boosters and antisemites agree: Jews have been
prominent and predominant in all phases of the [motion picture] business:
production, distribution and exhibition.' He noted that, at the time,
'Of the 100 most powerful people in the industry according to a recent
survey by Premiere, most, including the top 12, are Jewish,' but
observed, 'Though individual Jews control Hollywood, Jewishness does not'
... While statistics and studies on the subject are not readily available,
the Anti-Defamation League believes that the recitation of numbers and
percentages is not the answer to the false charges of Jewish 'control'
of the motion picture industry, or, indeed, of similar accusations involving
the media, banking, finance and other businesses. Reliance on statistics
alone plays into the hands of anti-Semites."
A Call for Media Democracy
FAIR,
Bankindex (from FAIR), December 8, 2002
"As the country reels from some of the biggest business scandals
in U.S. history, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is getting
ready to give big media a big gift-- the rollback of some of the last
regulatory checks on media consolidation. As part of its 2002 Biennial
Review, the FCC is 'reconsidering' many of the rules that have preserved
at least some vestige of media diversity ... Among the public interest
protections under threat: Newspaper/Broadcast Cross-Ownership Rule. Prevents
the owners of a broadcast station from owning daily newspapers in the
same market, and vice versa. National Broadcast Ownership Cap. Is meant
to prevent one company from owning broadcast stations that reach more
than 35 percent of U.S. households. The courts have asked the FCC to provide
a fuller justification of the rule, but the FCC seems ready to give it
up. Local Radio Ownership Rule. Caps the number of radio stations a company
can own in a single listening area to eight or less, depending on the
area's size. Duopoly Rule. Limits a company to owning two broadcast TV
stations in a given market. Dual Network Rule. Bars the major TV networks--
ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC-- from merging with each other. If these rules are
scrapped, big media's gain will be the public's loss. For example, without
the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership ban, many communities may find
their only local daily paper has been bought by one of the TV networks."
[Who rules the Mass Media?]
[NOTE: USC is one of the top film schools in the country]
Day
of the Jewish Trojan. USC's recruitment effort makes significant gains,
countering the school's embarrassing history of sometimes alienating Jews,
by Stuart Silverstein, Los Angeles Times,
December 11, 2002
"In the University of Southern California admissions office, Jessica
F. Pashkow works alongside colleagues who specialize in bringing Latino
and black undergraduates to campus, a goal of many universities around
the country. Pashkow's job is a rarer sort: She recruits Jews.
She urges co-workers — only half jokingly — to alert her to top prospects
whose last names end, for example, in 'berg,' 'baum' or 'bloom.' She makes
the rounds of college fairs at high schools in Southern California's Jewish
neighborhoods. Wherever she goes, she strategically places 'Jewish Life
at USC' brochures on the edge of her display table. If someone picks up
a copy, Pashkow discreetly mentions her role in Jewish recruitment. Often,
parents 'pull back a little bit and say, 'Really'?' said Pashkow,
who is Jewish. 'They want to make sure we're doing it for a kosher reason'
... Many people with USC ties privately say the university is trying to
win over more Jewish donors too. USC has a long and embarrassing history
of offending Jews. Its past includes a longtime president who was rumored
to be a Nazi sympathizer, a cross-burning incident on a Jewish fraternity
house lawn and an uproar in the dentistry school involving alumni accusations
that a dean was 'pro-Jewish' ... One of its important initiatives was
to court Jewish Los Angeles, a community known for its success in education,
not to mention the arts, sciences, professions and business ... In fact,
USC sits amid the second largest Jewish population in the nation — Jews
number about 600,000 in Southern California. Sample had an assessment
done of USC's Jewish resources, and found they were surprisingly vast:
One-third of the faculty was Jewish, as were one-third of the deans and
up to 2,000 of the campus' more than 27,000 students, although many were
in graduate or professional schools. USC officials knew, too, that a good
portion of the university's major donors through its 122 years have been
Jewish. And although USC leaders say their outreach isn't intended as
a fund-raising ploy, they acknowledge that Jews are giving more money
to the university than ever. Sample also determined that USC had an unheralded
asset in Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, which is next
to USC and offers courses in Jewish studies that USC students can take
for credit ... Today, a Jewish touch is evident all over campus. USC's
dean of religious life, Susan Laemmle, is a reform rabbi. A cooler in
the student center is stocked with kosher food. The campus is home to
the 4-year-old Casden Institute for the Study of the Jewish Role in American
Life, which organizes academic lectures and conferences, as well as public
forums on issues affecting the local Jewish community ... According to
the university's informal polling, the percentage of Jews in this year's
freshman class is 8.2%, up from 4.6% a decade ago. That's still far below
the 20%-plus level estimated for some Ivy League schools, but comparable
with UCLA, where the latest available survey showed that 7% of freshmen
were Jews. Jews also have become more influential in the leadership of
USC. A symbolic breakthrough came in September, when businessman Gold
became chairman of the board of trustees. (A Jewish newspaper, Forward,
headlined the story: 'Once-WASPy USC Names First Jew as Board Chair.')
.... [M]any Jews in Los Angeles were angered by USC's plan to house a
Middle East Center that, at the urging of Saudi Arabian officials, was
to be funded by American corporations doing billions of dollars of business
with the Saudis. The American Jewish Committee charged that the unusual
deal threatened the academic integrity of the university, and later the
faculty senate and a USC advisory council both condemned the idea. USC
ultimately backed away from the deal ... As a lighthearted reminder, Pashkow
circulates around the admissions office a three-page memo called 'Jews
Clues.' The first piece of advice is to spot names ending in 'baum,' 'berg,'
'burg,' 'bloom,' 'man,' 'stein,' 'thal,' 'vitz' or 'witz.' Another dead
giveaway mentioned in the memo: If applicants mention that they have had
a bar or bat mitzvah. Her co-workers 'think it's cute, they laugh at it,'
Pashkow said. But the memo also prompts her colleagues to put a 'JWSH'
coding on applications from Jewish students."
Fascists
hijack Lord of the Rings,
Birmingham Post (UK), Dec 18 2002
"Fascists have hijacked Tolkien's Lord of the Rings as propaganda
to further their cause. As the second film of the trilogy, The Two
Towers, comes out on general release today, a Midland academic has
expressed concerns that neo-Nazi groups are interpreting the Birmingham
author's epic for their own ends. One Internet website urges 'every white
nationalist' to watch the films, which it claims promote white supremacy
over ethnic minorities living in the West. Dr Stephen Shapiro,
an English expert at the University of Warwick, said the adoption of the
literary masterpiece by far right groups was worrying. Tolkien lovers
also expressed horror that the books were being used to promote extremism
'There is not a grain of truth in their interpretation and I would ask
people to read it for what it is - a very good story,' she said. Dr Shapiro
said he could understand why Tolkien's works had been adopted by the far
right but he called for loyal fans to confront the extremists' views."
From
celluloid to synagogue: Do film fests build Jewish identity?,
Jewish Telegraphic Agency, December 24, 2002
"[A]ccording to a new report by the Jewish Outreach Institute in
New York ['Can Watching a Movie Lead to Greater Jewish Affiliation?']
... the burgeoning Jewish film festival scene holds not only big box-office
potential but the possibility of moving unaffiliated Jews 'along the continuum
of Jewish involvement.' The institute examined 46 festivals. One-quarter
of them are independently run, while the others have some kind of sponsorship
Jewish institutions or organizations, such as Jewish community centers
or federations. 'Film festivals serve as an entryway into the Jewish community,'
institute spokesman Paul Golin says ... The pioneering Jewish film
fest, launched in 1980 in San Francisco, has spawned more than 60 similar
events annually in the United States, from Fairbanks to Philadelphia.
Another half dozen are held in Canada, and about two dozen globally, from
London to Hong Kong to Sao Paulo, Brazil. In one sure sign that the festivals
have arrived, the National Foundation for Jewish Culture sponsors an annual
Jewish Film Festival conference. The third such conference, set for San
Diego this February, will explore issues such as curating films about
Israel in the Diaspora. The foundation also receives up to 70 applicants
each year for the $150,000 it awards annually for Jewish documentary film
making. ... In Boston, Rubin says festival officials screened 450
films before picking this year’s selections."
Rudeness
wins all the marbles. In Hollywood, moguls' bad behavior is rarely punished,
by Patrick Goldstein, Los Angeles Times,
December 24, 2002
"Personally, I think most of the people at Endeavor could use a three-week
sojourn to charm school," says [DreamWorks marketing chief Terry]
Press. 'But this is Hollywood, the only business in the world where
people seem to confuse rudeness with power. People think that being rude
and demeaning is somehow a show of importance when, to me, it just suggests
that you're dealing with a lot of spoiled brats whose mommies didn't give
them enough time-outs.' Getting into the Christmas spirit, the industry
has been buzzing -- perhaps chortling would be a better word -- over Ken
Auletta's barbed New Yorker profile of Miramax czar Harvey Weinstein.
The piece that ran in the Dec. 16 issue was highlighted by accounts of
Weinstein's nasty showdowns with producer Scott Rudin, Universal
Chairman Stacey Snider, filmmaker Julie Taymor (who made "Frida"
for Miramax) and volcanic-tempered Vivendi Universal chief Barry Diller,
who called Weinstein 'a bully,' which is sort of like Trent Lott
attacking David Duke for being a bigot. Of course in Hollywood, a town
so competitive that people routinely root for friends to fail, many players
thought Weinstein got off easy. Several executives I spoke to last
week dismissed the profile as 'a puff piece.' Translation: The Miramax
boss is even a worse ogre than portrayed in the story. Only a death sentence
would fit his crimes. In fact, the 'hip' Hollywood insult of the moment
is for someone, just before slamming down the phone in a fit of rage,
to bellow, 'You should die!' The trash talk may have changed, but the
sentiments are older than talking pictures. Bad behavior is permanently
embedded in showbiz DNA. Since its wild 'n' woolly early years, Hollywood
has been a briar patch of feuding moguls, narcissistic movie stars and
egomaniacal directors ... Rudin's tantrums with agents are the
stuff of legend; many people believe a Rudin showdown with Endeavor's
imperious Ari Emanuel would draw a bigger crowd than a Tyson-Holyfield
fight. But the hot-tempered producer dotes on his favored writers and
actors; he throws potted plants only at his lowly assistants. When Viacom
Entertainment Chairman Jonathan Dolgen was an exec at 20th Century
Fox, assistants were forbidden to say hello to him in the hallways, since
a cheery 'Good morning, Mr. Dolgen!' might disrupt the great man's
train of thought ... Everyone has a pet theory about why Hollywood is
such a hotbed of boorishness. One explanation: Showbiz is teeming with
unhappy, insecure people with a lethal combination of big egos and low
self-esteem. 'Show business attracts a lot of borderline narcissists who
had unhappy childhoods,' says Arnold Stiefel, a film producer and manager
who handles crooner Rod Stewart. 'These are the people who were bullied
in school but, now that they've become powerful, they've become the school
bully themselves." It's no wonder people describe Hollywood as high school,
except with money. But is it money that corrupts? Or were the scariest
showbiz monsters just as devilish when they were 22-year-old nobodies?
People say Diller was equally fearsome in his youth. 'When Scott Rudin
was a young executive at Fox, he'd return my phone calls at 8 p.m.," recalls
veteran manager Bernie Brillstein, who was the first person in
Hollywood to blow the whistle on ex-power agent Michael Ovitz's
noxious behavior ... 'This is a business where, if you succeed, people
will allow you to behave badly,' says Revolution Studios founder Joe
Roth. 'There are no rules, other than winning' ... The analysts' couches
must get quite a beating in this business. I was surprised by how many
industry-ites I spoke with -- people with reputations for being mild-mannered
-- acknowledged having been in therapy for anger management issues. 'No
matter how corporate Hollywood has become, it's still a very emotional
business,' says Variety editor Peter Bart, who as a production
executive in the 1970s fired a director in mid-argument' ... 'People are
often tough on their staff because you're so frustrated by your lack of
control of everything else in the filmmaking process that you obsess on
the few things you can control,' says Jersey Films partner Michael
Shamberg."
Kings
of Hollywood in epic battle to film. Alexander Luhrmann and Stone lead
race for frank take on conqueror,
Guardian (UK), December 30, 2002
"As armies mass again on the borders of Mesopotamia, film-makers
are fighting to be first over the top with a movie about the original
and most rapacious western imperialist of them all - Alexander the Great.
Four of Hollywood's most prodigious talents have long wanted to measure
themselves against the upstart Macedonian who conquered nine-tenths of
the known world in his 33 years. But for decades film-makers have shied
away from fully portraying the complex personality of the most feared
and revered leader in history. Now at last the time seems to have come
for the first bisexual action hero - with Alexander hopping, in one script,
from the bed of his boyhood friend and lover Hephaestion, to that of the
Queen of the Amazons and onward through a host of eunuchs and catamites.
Oliver Stone, Martin Scorsese and Ridley Scott have all laboured
on pet projects about the messianic king who led a modest army out of
his father's Balkan kingdom and brought it to the borders of India, demolishing
empires and civilisations in his wake ... Some Greek nationalists have
already protested at the mention of Alexander's supposed homosexuality,
describing it as a 'disgrace' and a 'slur on Greece' - although the ancient
Hellenes had a more relaxed view of these things. [Oliver] Stone
has blamed the Greek government for orchestrating the outrage, and its
culture minister, Evangelos Venizelos, has withdrawn support from the
project. But he has stopped short of condemning it outright. Faced with
protests from opposition MPs, he said: 'We cannot censor Hollywood. I
don't know what I can do.'"
The
Balance of Media Power Is Poised to Change,
New York Times, December 30, 2002
"F.C.C.'s Chief Seeks to Remove Restraints: If all goes according
to plan, 2003 will be the most important year in the tenure of Michael
K. Powell as head of the Federal Communications Commission. Mr. Powell
is preparing to unleash a set of proposals in the next few months that
will unshackle the nation's largest broadcasters and telecommunications
conglomerates from restraints that have prevented them from growing. He
is armed with a broad deregulatory agenda and a series of court opinions
that have questioned or struck down some of the agency's most pivotal
and longest-lasting rules ... At the top of Mr. Powell's list is his plan
to relax or eliminate a variety of restraints on the size of the nation's
broadcasters and cable owners. The ownership rules that the commission
will reconsider restrict a newspaper from owning a TV station in the same
city. They prevent a media conglomerate from owning two television networks.
They prohibit a network from owning stations that broadcast to more than
35 percent of the nation's homes. They restrict a broadcaster from owning
two television stations in the same market unless there are at least eight
other competitors. They restrict a company from owning more than eight
radio stations in the same market. And they prohibit a cable company from
owning more than 30 percent of the national market."
Poland
Examines Media Bribe Allegation,
WIBC (Indiana) (from Associated Press), January
7, 2002
"Prosecutors questioned a newspaper editor Monday about published
allegations that a leading film producer sought a $17.5 million bribe
to lobby the government for more media-friendly laws. The allegations
against Lew Rywin were carried last month by the newspaper Gazeta
Wyborcza. It reported he approached its chief editor with the offer
last July, claiming he represented Prime Minister Leszek Miller. Rywin,
57, is one of Poland's most prominent media entrepreneurs. His company,
Heritage Films, co-produced Steven Spielberg's 'Schindler's
List,' which won a 1993 Academy Award for best film. 'The Pianist, [by
fellow Jewish filmmaker Roman Polanski] which featured Rywin
as an actor, won the Palme d'Or top prize at last year's Cannes Film Festival.
Rywin has refused to comment on the bribery allegation ... Warsaw prosecutors
began their investigation Monday by questioning Gazeta chief editor
Adam Michnik [also Jewish], a communist-era dissident and leading
critic of a proposed measure to change to media laws. Private media have
protested the bill, saying it would strengthen the monopoly of state television
with restrictions on private ownership of television and radio stations."
[Israel Asper is clearly Hell-bent upon giving, all by himself, the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion credibility]
Rumours of war Conflict
in the Middle East has come to Canada, with Izzy Asper's National Post
criticizing the CBC's coverage of the battle between Israelis and Palestinians,
Ottawa Sun, January 12, 2003
"The relentless Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a deep quagmire,
and Canadians fear it. A recent polling of readers by the Globe and
Mail [in Toronto] named Israel, not Iraq or North Korea, the world's
most dangerous hot spot by a goodly margin. Such an apprehension helps
explain the federal government's reluctance to discuss it, much less deal
with it: Why jump into bottomless antagonism? But the Liberal government,
and the other political parties, may be dragged into it if the Asper
media empire has its way. In a recent, frank epistle in his National
Post, Canwest Global chairman Israel Asper wrote of
his love for his namesake. To him, Israel is a moral beacon to
the world. So it is not surprising that since he took control of the Post
from Conrad Black the paper has taken an ever-tougher line against Israel's
enemies and, accordingly, the CBC [Canadian Broadcasting Company]
has become one of them. The Post now regularly harries the CBC
for its 'biased' Middle East reporting. Leading the charge is Norman
Spector, a former chief of staff to Brian Mulroney who was rewarded
for this service with Canada's ambassadorship to Israel. Spector's
attachment to the Jewish state seems every bit as strong as his employer's,
and if his columns are a guide, the Asper campaign against the
corporation will continue to escalate. Last Wednesday Spector implied
the CBC coverage fuelled anti-Semitism of the sort voiced by David
Ahenakew, the former First Nations chief. Asper, Spector,
and the Post accuse the CBC of mollycoddling terrorists by refusing
to use that word to describe the organizations which back attacks on Israelis
... Asper has previously called for the Chretien government to
rein in the CBC, arguing the PM himself was being treated unfairly by
the Mother Corp. The Post has just been in front of a successful
campaign to have the government ban Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based radical
party that sponsors attacks on Israel. If the CBC does not back
down, can a demand for Ottawa to make it do so be far behind? ... While
Asper is a lifelong Liberal, his agitating on this issue is far from welcome.
Hezbollah had few friends here, yet the government was reluctant to act.
Why? Because it feared the issue might generate a national concern over
the rights and wrongs of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with who knows
what consequences for our vaunted multicultural diversity. Support for
Israel in Canada seems to have been slipping in the last few years as
its military might, including nukes, and televised images from the intifada
-- slingshots vs. tanks -- have undermined the notion Israel is simply
a noble little nation surrounded by relentless, powerful enemies. Those
who accuse the CBC are further undermined by their very staunch
support for the Bush administration's plans to topple Saddam Hussein --
which Canadians seem to favour less and less. And it seems to me the notion
that Canada must support Israel because it is the front lines of the global
war on terror is being more and more rejected in Canada as simplistic,
and bullying. Finally, and vitally, the CBC, unlike Hezbollah,
has many friends. The anger voiced and pressed by Asper and Spector is
no sham. For them the issue truly is black and white. In taking on the
CBC and insisting theirs is the only legitimate interpretation
in line with history and democratic values, they seem to be overreaching.
And it may rebound on them and on Israel."
[Aspiring Jewish mini-mogul alienates whole small town by turning
its newspaper into his attack base.]
Newspaper
for sale at online auction,
Cleveland Plain Dealer, January 12, 2003
"Pssst. Over here. Wanna buy a newspaper? Not a single copy. The
whole thing. The Rapids Record in Wood County is for sale on eBay
for a suggested opening bid of $35,000. Alan Abrams and his wife,
Nancy, bought it last year and want out, he said, because they are being
harassed by village officials and local business people who don't like
their muckraking attitude. Mike Marsh, solicitor for this village of 900,
says it's the officials and business people who view themselves as the
victims of harassment. He said that before the Abramses got hold
of the paper, 'it was really more of an advertising circular. . . . It
became more like a newspaper after. The tone changed, also.' Mayor Judy
Keifer said last week that one official in particular, village administrator
Chad Hoffman, has been harassed. Keifer believes Hoffman has done a good
job and said that in the year she has been mayor, she has received three
complaints about him. Two were unfounded, and one had to do with a snow-covered
street that wasn't plowed fast enough for one resident, she said. In a
telephone interview, Alan Abrams characterized Hoffman as 'a Boss
Hogg,' after the town boss on the old 'Dukes of Hazzard' TV series. Hoffman
declined comment. Abrams said there was such a backlash against the way
he and his wife ran the paper that the Chamber of Commerce even folded
... LaRoe also said he and others shifted their advertising away from
the Record after Abrams acquired it because they wanted to be associated
with something that was more positive ... Abrams also said his
phone line has been cut at least five times and his tires slashed at least
that often. Also, he said he has received a threatening anti-Semitic letter,
and he accuses Hoffman himself of removing a petition from a bulletin
board that had called for the administrator's ouster. Abrams and
his wife suspended publication in June."
[Here we have the merger of Jewish preeminence in pornography, Jewish
dominance of the movie world, and Jewish celebration of both realms, all
rolled into one. ]
Jewish
Films To Watch at Sundance,
[Jewish] Forward, January 17, 2003
"Andrew Jarecki brings to this year's Sundance [Film Festival]
a new kind of legend — an indie who has already made a million ($388 million,
to be exact, which is what AOL paid for his company, Moviefone,
in 1999, keeping him on as CEO). The multitalented mogul, who has also
penned and performed songs for the WB's late, lamented 'Felicity,' is
showing his documentary 'Capturing the Friedmans,' one of several offerings
topping the list of must-see films with Jewish themes ... Buzz for 'Friedmans'
is strong. In 1987, New York Newsday broke the story of Arnold
Friedman, an upper-middle-class high school teacher from Great Neck,
Long Island, who was arrested as part of a federal sting operation against
mail-order pornography. Friedman's wife ran a childcare center
from their home; Friedman was also a buyer of child pornography.
As detailed in 'Capturing the Friedmans,' during the arrest agents began
to suspect that children who came to the Friedmans' home for day
care and after-school computer classes were being abused. Jarecki
was given surprising access to the family's home videos, which he uses
to sort through the various versions of the truth regarding the charges.
The filmmaker also examines the Great Neck community that turned against
the Friedmans and the legal system that baffled them. A Friedman
figures in another Sundance documentary — Andrei Friedman, who
dropped his Hungarian-Jewish name for the more dashing moniker Robert
Capa when he immigrated to Paris from Budapest. In 'Robert Capa: In
Love and War,' acclaimed filmmaker Anne Makepeace re-creates the life
and work of this legendary war photographer. When Friedman first arrived
in Paris, 'Robert Capa' was wholly imaginary — a rich American photographer
that he and his collaborator girlfriend invented to gain credibility.
The ruse was quickly uncovered, but his work was so good that the young
photographer took on the persona of Capa and went on to document the Spanish
Civil War, the Sino-Japanese War, World War II and Israel's War for Independence."
First 'Jewsploitation'
film to debut at Sundance festival,
Jewish Bulletin, January 17, 2003
"At one point in Jonathan Kesselman's 'Jewish exploitation'
comedy, 'The Hebrew Hammer,' Mordechai Jefferson Carver strides into a
seedy skinhead bar wearing a long leather coat, a black fedora, payot,
a tallit and an oversized gold chai. A chalkboard advertises beer on tap,
such as Old Adolf, but the titular superhero orders 'Manischewitz, straight
up.' Then he crashes a bottle over the bartender's head, whips out two
sawed-off shotguns and shouts, 'Shabbat Shalom, Motherf- - - - -s!' In
this outrageous world of the Hammer (Adam Goldberg), the Orthodox
Jewish hero must battle the evil son of Santa (Andy Dick) to save Chanukah.
Call it the Jewish 'Shaft.' The farce is Kesselman's homage to
1970s 'blaxploitation' films ... 'The movie is a love letter to being
Jewish,' said the writer-director ... The film -- which also features
an organization called The Worldwide Jewish Media Conspiracy -- is part
of a new trend of in-your-face ethnicity touted by hip Jewish artists
(think Heeb magazine and New York's 'Jewsapalooza' music festival) ...
I rented a whole bunch of blaxploitation films to figure out how the genre
worked [said Kesselman] I learned that what I needed was some twist
on the source of oppression. I asked myself, 'What as a Jew really pisses
me off?' It hit me when I was walking around a mall
in December: I hate Christmastime ... 'The Hammer celebrates being
Jewish,' he said. 'It's a bad-ass Jew kicking ass for the tribe.'"
Media
Has Ron Lauder Lost His Touch?,
Forbes, January 24, 2003
"[Ronald Lauder's Central European Media] saga is rife
with great ambition, but also greed and betrayal. Lauder grew acquainted
with Eastern Europe while serving as U.S. ambassador to Austria in 1986-87.
After the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, most post-communist governments
were still holding on fast to their airwaves. But Lauder saw an opening
when the Czech Republic, one of the wealthier Soviet bloc countries, decided
to privatize a TV broadcasting license. However, the government said it
would sell only to a Czech citizen. So Lauder teamed up with former Czech
dissident Vladimir Zelezny [also Jewish] and put his money behind
the man's bid. They won in 1994. The same year Lauder started CME, which
provided capital and programming for the new television channel, called
TV Nova. Lauder owned 99% of Nova, but Zelezny held the
actual permit to broadcast. Nova was glitzy station, serving Czechs with
Baywatch and Beverly Hills 90210 in prime time and sex on weekend nights.
Lauder put $140 million behind the venture. Nova was soon booking
$1 million per week in profit. Lauder's appetite grew, and CME
soon expanded to TV markets in Romania, Slovakia, Ukraine and elsewhere.
But Lauder's timing was off. Those markets were too green to generate
sufficient ad sales. Nova's profit was soon bailing out its sister stations.
In 1999, with CME's losses mounting, Lauder decided to merge the company
with Sweden's SBS Broadcasting. But old friend Zelezny became Lauder's
foe. He wouldn't let go of Nova's profitable broadcasting license. Without
Nova, the SBS deal was off. A flurry of international lawsuits and appeals
followed, against both Zelezny and the Czech Republic, which Lauder
said breached an international treaty by allowing the license to be taken
from CME. Lauder bought full-page ads in The New York Times
and The Washington Post urging business to 'think twice' about
investing in the Czech Republic, where practices 'fall woefully short
of international standards.' (Strangely, Estée Lauder, the cosmetics
firm, of which Lauder owns 35% and is a director, kept its Prague
store open and recently launched a second one.) ... CME has sued the Czech
government for over $500 million, the assumed fair market value of TV
Nova in 1999. Courts in the Netherlands, London and Sweden agreed with
CME and released a 'partial finder of order' that held the Czech government
responsible for the loss of Nova. The damages award should be announced
by March 2003. The company also won a $28 million award from Zelezny.
The Czechs appealed, but Zelezny, who was elected to the Czech
Senate and whom the Czech police reportedly investigated on charges of
tax evasion, paid up last fall."
The News the Jews
Thought Fit to Print,
by Al Ellenberg, Jerusalem Report,
May 22, 2000
[ADOLPH SIMON OCHS: Review of The Trust: The Private and Powerful Family
Behind the New York Times by Susan E. Tifft and Alex S. Jones]
"A college friend once remarked to me that my father talked like
a New York Times editorial with a Yiddish accent. There was also
a touch of pride. Even though this 'shul' looked like a very big church,
my father did after all call it a shul, which meant there was something
Jewish about the Times. But what was it that I detected in my father’s
voice, what distance, what pained irony? Well, over the years, the broad
answers became evident to me. Those answers encompassed the gulf between
the assimilationist Jews of German origin who invented the Reform movement
in America and the rough-edged Jews from Eastern Europe, my father’s kind.
And, specifically in the case of the Times, the answers included the early
reluctance to acknowledge that Jews were explicit targets of Hitler’s
death machine; the answers also included the early editorial opposition
of the Times to a Zionist state in Palestine. My father was not only a
Zionist, he was a Zionist in the Jabotinsky mold. I have spent pretty
much all of my working life in the newspaper business and, to borrow a
suspect self-exculpation, some of my best friends work at the Times, but
as much as I find the daily appearance of this publication vital to my
psychic well-being (particularly the crossword puzzle), I have always
felt a bit of an inherited chill about the institution of the Times. It
was never my family. But, of course, The New York Times is a family, one
of the most powerfully dynastic in American history, up there with the
Cabots and Lodges, Rockefellers and Kennedys. The Ochses and Sulzbergers
have owned the Times enterprise, now a multi-billion dollar operation,
for more than a hundred years, and in all that time the family has maintained
day-to-day control of this most prestigious of all daily newspapers ...
Adolph Simon Ochs, a Cincinnati-born son of Bavarian Jewish immigrants
... bought the comatose Chattanooga Times with a borrowed $250 ... [H]e
bought The New York Times for a patchworked $75,000 by conning its stockholders
into believing that he had the money and the expertise to revive the 45-year-old
paper ... [H]is wife ... Effie herself was a rather extreme embodiment
of Germanic Jewish American anomalies ... Ochs’s achievements were
shadowed by two major sieges of depression, both tinged by his struggle
with his Jewish identity. The first was set off by the appalling case
of Leo Frank in 1914; the second was occasioned by the rise of
Adolf Hitler in 1933 ... Ochs, always reluctant to play the role
of crusader, particularly on behalf of Jews, was persuaded to rally to
Frank’s defense ... AFTER OCHS’S DEATH, IN 1935, he was succeeded by his
son-in-law, Arthur Hays Sulzberger, who was married to the Ochses’
only child, Iphigene. Sulzberger was the scion of a wealthy merchandising
family with both German and Sephardi roots; his mother, in fact, was extremely
proud of the fact that her Sephardi ancestors, themselves descended from
Iberian Jews who fled to Holland in 1492 and then immigrated to the New
World in the early 1700s, had fought in the American Revolution. Arthur’s
father Cyrus was very active on behalf of Jewish causes and had
served as president of United Hebrew Charities ... Under subsequent publishers,
the Times’s policy toward Israel has become considerably more accepting
and its coverage of Jewish matters far less tentative. Most significantly,
the last three executive editors of the paper have been overtly and unapologetically
Jewish, a development that Ochs himself would likely have found
rankling."
[Note: Joe Farah is THE Arab Zionist sell-out.]
Joe Farah's Impending
Insanity and the Demise of WorldNetDaily,
Karen De Coster, February 2, 2003
"I discovered WND on the web in 1998. There were not a lot of good
websites out there at that time, other than organization, foundation,
or think tank websites, so it certainly became - and quickly so - one
of the better sites on the web. When WND was relatively new it was part
conservative, part libertarian, part libertarian sympathetic, and included
only a smattering of neocons. But one could just ignore the crazy, neocon
stuff, and pay attention to what was useful and interesting. All in all,
it was a valuable place on the web, for the folks over there tackled PC,
relativism, multiculturalism, anti-Westernism, and all the other horrors
of left society. Farah always seemed willing to take on all issues without
regret. Sometime in about 2000 it started to change. Joe Farah - WND's
big kahuna - searched for means of financing the existence and growth
of his home on the web. WND, at about this time, started to crack. By
paying close attention, you could see the focus shift from libertarian
theory, private property defense, and unPCism, to Israel, Israel, Israel,
war, war, war. Folks were passing around e-mails, pasting over the WND
headlines of the day, where 14 out of the first 16 headings would deal
with: Israel good, Arabs bad; Israel this-Israel that; military this-military
that; the glory of war; Bush does this-Bush says that; and well, you get
the picture. WND had become a neocon, warmongering, statist hell. Following
9/11, WND had become a shill for the government and the U.S.-Israel alliance.
After 9/11, Farah and his site jumped on the Bandwagon for War, and kept
up a relentless stream of Republican worshipping and 'if you ain't with
us, you're against us' horseshit. They dumped Lew Rockwell - one of their
few remaining sane columnists - and brought on the pro-war bunch."
Shoah
for Sale. Roger Kumble’s ends his edgy trilogy with a look at how Hollywood
abuses the Holocaust,
Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, February 7, 2003
"In 'Turnaround,' the third play in Roger Kumble’s sardonic
trilogy about Hollywood, Jewish hack Jeff Pelzman gushes over a sure-fire
hit movie. Compiled by combining the plots of Oscar-winners, the fictional
script opens as the camera pans down through the worried faces of Jewish
Poles 'until we find Moishe, a 12-year-old mentally challenged
boy, skipping through the ghetto.' 'A retard in the Holocaust,' Pelzman
says. 'That’s f—king brilliant!' The cringeworthy scene is typical of
the hysterically mordant play, starring 'Friends' star David Schwimmer
as a leech who’d swindle his mom (or trivialize the Holocaust) for a 'go'
film or a hot babe. Jonathan Silverman, Schwimmer’s old
pal from Beverly Hills High, plays the equally depraved Jewish producer,
Richie Tolchin. Kumble wrote the black comedy for the two
actors, who each portrayed Pelzman in the trilogy’s first two plays,
which have been called a Generation X take on a subject addressed in more
mature plays, such as David Rabe’s 'Hurlyburly.' Although staging
the satire at the Coast Playhouse has been a labor of love for the Jewish
artists, each feels nervous about the provocative subject matter. Schwimmer
warned underage 'Friends' fans to stay away; Silverman begged
a Journal reporter, 'Don’t hate me!' while Kumble said he
was 'terrified' his motivations could be misconstrued. At a Larchmont
Boulevard cafe recently, the edgy but convivial writer-director ('Cruel
Intentions,' 'The Sweetest Thing') said he conceived the 'Moishe'
script partly as an homage to Mel Brooks’ Holocaust spoof, 'Springtime
for Hitler,' in 'The Producers.” Another motivation was 'noticing that
every Holocaust-themed film seemed to get nominated for an Oscar,' he
said. 'But I wanted to comment on people who use the Holocaust as a means
to an end, not to skewer my own people.” Kumble also wanted to
continue skewering a real-life, reformed Hollywood creep: himself. He
said he invented Pelzman — 'definitely an alter-ego of mine'— for
his 1993 comedy-drama 'Pay or Play' (starring Silverman) after
a friend suggested, 'write what you know' ... 'Opening night was a little
uncomfortable,' said Silverman, whose character calls Steven
Spielberg 'Mr. Holocaust.' 'But our parents understand that this is
a morality tale. I mean, these kinds of people actually exist. There are
people in this town who would kick their grandmother in the tooth to make
a movie. I don’t think it comes across as a smear of Jews in Hollywood
so much as it does on certain people who have just lost their perspective.'”
Report:
Zeta-Jones may convert to Judaism,
CNN, Janary 31, 200
"Pregnant actress Catherine Zeta-Jones is considering converting
to Judaism before marrying Michael Douglas, according to a report
in British newspaper The Mail on Sunday. The British tabloid reports
the 30-year-old Welsh beauty is 'fascinated' by her future husband's Jewish
faith and has spoken to a rabbi about converting. 'Michael and
his family are very proud of their Jewish heritage,' an unnamed source
said to be close to Zeta-Jones told the paper. 'In Judaism, the mother
pays a pivotal role in raising the children to honor their faith.' The
Mail on Sunday reported that the couple, who announced their
engagement on January 6, had agreed to raise their child Jewish. Douglas's
father, movie legend Kirk Douglas, last month reaffirmed his faith
with a second bar mitzvah ceremony."
Vivendi
suitor Davis beckons Bronfman,
New York Daily News, February 20, 2003
"Marvin Davis wants Edgar Bronfman Jr. The oil
tycoon who's made a $20 billion bid for the show biz assets of hobbled
media empire Vivendi Universal recently tried to hire Bronfman
to run the show. But the Seagram scion turned him down, sources told the
Daily News. Davis called and told him he could 'play any
role,' at Vivendi Universal Entertainment, sources close to Bronfman
said. But Bronfman, who is vice chairman of Vivendi and
whose family is its largest shareholder with a nearly 5% stake, said he'd
stay 'on the Vivendi Universal side of the table,' sources said.
Davis already has hooked up with ex-Universal exec Brian
Mulligan, but he's been scouring the market for a marquee Hollywood name
to help bolster his bid for the entertainment divisions, which include
Universal Pictures and Universal Music Group. Bronfman
ran these units before selling Seagram to Vivendi - watching
his family lose billions in the process. Sources said Bronfman,
a one-time songwriter, is eager to get back to the front lines of the
entertainment business. In September, he offered to 'help' Vivendi
out of its cash crunch by acquiring Universal Music. Vivendi
chief Jean-Rene Fourtou said he wasn't ready to sell. Industry sources
said they expect Bronfman to make a run at AOL Time Warner's Warner
Music Group, which appears to be in play as the troubled media giant
looks to pare down its $26 billion debt load "
[Walt Disney, declared by the Jewish community to have been an "anti-Semite,"
is probably rolling over in his grave because of what the Disney "world"
has become" from Disney's Jewish CEO, Michael Eisner, on down.]
Disney's
Shamrock mulls $100 mln Israel fund,
Forbes, Feberuary 24, 2003
"Shamrock Holdings of California Inc, the investment arm of Disney
heir Roy Disney, is examining the possibility of setting up a $100 million
investment fund in Israel, a financial sector source said on Monday. The
fund could eventually reach $250 million with part of the money coming
from abroad, the source said, adding that Shamrock Chairman Stanley
Gold was planning to meet Israeli institutional investors this week.
Potential investors include insurers Migdal Insurance Holdings ,
which is controlled by Italy's Generali , and Israel's Phoenix Insurance
... . Shamrock's other main investments in Israel are mobile phone service
provider Pelephone and Tadiran Communications."
Georgia
senator lashes out at proposed hillbilly reality television show,
Yahoo! News, (from Associated Press), February
25, 2003
"A proposed hillbilly reality show has struck a nerve with Sen. Zell
Miller, who hails from the North Georgia mountains and contends poor rural
residents are America's last acceptable target of bigotry. Miller lashed
out at CBS executives in a Senate speech Tuesday for their plans to air
'The Real Beverly Hillbillies,' which would chronicle a rural, lower-middle-class
family that moves into a luxurious Beverly Hills mansion. The program
is modeled after the hit 1960s sitcom. The Georgia Democrat, a former
two-term governor, called the proposal a 'minstrel show' and 'Cracker
Comedy' at the expense of hardworking Americans. He said he doubted CBS
Television chief executive Leslie Moonves [Jewish] would
dare try such a spoof featuring a black or Latino family. 'I plead with
you to call off your hillbilly hunt,' Miller said. 'Make your big bucks
some other way. Appeal to the best in America, not the worst. Give bigotry
no sanction.' As criticism built in January over the prospect of such
a show, Moonves apologized and said the network meant no offense.
On Tuesday, CBS spokesman Chris Ender also stressed the network wasn't
trying to offend anyone and said it's not clear when — or even if — the
proposed show, which did offend Miller, will air."
Disney Company. A Grim
Shadow Of Walt's Dream,
rense.com, March 3, 2003
"It was brought to my attention, in the course of a recent exchange,
that the 'Disney' Company has come out with a 'new and improved' telling
of the story of the Alamo... one that is 'multicultural' in tone, and
not 'offensive to Mexican-Americans'. I almost lost my supper. You know,
it's hard for me to see even an old Disney movie, when they play on television...
and they do, here, quite a bit ... They used to be so good. I remember
the pre-Eisner Disney [Michael Eisner, the Jewish CEO
of Disney] with a certain fondness, and it's hard for me to watch
what that company has become. Walt Disney devoted his life to making films
that were clean, positive and wholesome. I know that sounds 'preachy',
and that's not typical of me, at all, but it's true. They were, when I
was growing up, and well into my adulthood, one of the only 'sure bets'
for a film that you could take your kids to see, without any concern over
the 'content' or language used ... That is what is lacking in the 'Disney'
Company now: a conscience...or 'soul' (or whatever word you chose to call
it). People like Eisner...to me, the Anti-Christ incarnate...do
nothing but pervert, corrupt and destroy. I won't waste the price of a
ticket to see any Disney movie, now. I won't even rent the old ones. It
simply makes me ill to see what has happened to the Company, but more
importantly, to the ideals and standards that Walt Disney spent his life
to develop."
Michael
Jackson Put 'Curse' on Spielberg-Magazine,
Reuters, March 3, 2003
"Embattled pop star Michael Jackson wears a prosthetic nose and once
paid $150,000 for a 'voodoo curse' to kill director Steven Spielberg
despite being deep in debt, Vanity Fair magazine reported on Monday
... Vanity Fair reported in the article that in 2000 Jackson attended
a voodoo ritual in Switzerland where a witch doctor promised that Spielberg,
music mogul David Geffen and 23 other people on the entertainer's
list of enemies would die ... In addition to the lawsuit by Lee, Jackson
is also enmeshed in a $21 million court battle with German concert promoter
Marcel Avram over canceled Millennium concerts and has been sued
by Sotheby's auction house for $1.6 million."
[The careful Jewish monitoring of history. For years Jewish groups
have lobbied against any examination of Adolf Hitler, except as a demonic
mass murderer of Jews. The issue is not just that Jews -- functioning
always as a censorship board -- have total control of the boundaries in
analyzing/depicting Adolf Hitler, it is that they truly control the history
of World War II (Holocaust, Holocaust, Holocaust) and -- for that matter
-- ANY history that has anything to do with Jews. All contexts that don't
fit the complete Jewish victimization model and the social and political
reasons -- per Jews -- for the rise of an Adolf Hitler are categorically
discarded.]
Moonves:
No Sympathy for Hitler,
Virtual Jerusalem
"President and CEO of CBS Television Leslie Moonves came in
for a good deal of flak last year following news that the network was
planning to make a two-part miniseries from British history professor
Ian Kershaw’s book, 'Hitler: 1889-l936: Hubris' (W.W. Norton & Company,
2000), which covers the prewar life and times of the Führer. Some Jewish
leaders worried that a too-sympathetic portrayal of the early life of
the man responsible for the murder of 6 million Jews would feed into today’s
current wave of anti-Semitism and that a prime-time portrait of the youthful
Hitler might paint him as a misunderstood youth rather than an evil madman
to millions of young viewers with scant knowledge of Hitler’s terrible
legacy. This month, CBS, along with the producers, Alliance Atlantic,
began shooting the miniseries in Prague and might air the show as early
as the May sweeps. Scottish actor Robert Carlyle — best known for 'The
Full Monty' and 'Trainspotting' — plays Adolf Hitler, while Stockard Channing
(first lady Abby Bartlet on 'The West Wing') portrays his mother. The
cast also includes Julianna Margulies, Peter O’Toole, Liev Schreiber and
Matthew Modine. The Jewish Journal read an early script — which
CBS now says has been totally junked in favor of a completely new version
by Jewish playwright-screenwriter John Pielmeier ('Agnes
of God') ...
Leslie Moonves: Clearly the whole thing ends when Hitler has taken
over total power of the country in 1938 on the eve of World War II. We
will also be showing a postscript. That’s very important. Once again,
we do take some of the comments we’ve received very seriously. And one
comment I took to heart: if you are showing the rise to power — and part
of why we’re doing this is that everybody knows how the story ended but
few people know how it began — some people said, 'Well you’re not showing
the atrocities that this man committed. And you may be giving an incorrect
impression of him.' So it’s important to know where this led seven or
eight years later ...
Jewish Journal: We heard CBS is making a donation to a Holocaust
charity? Moonves: Yes, to the Shoah Foundation or something like
that. It’s not quite pinned down yet ...
Jewish Journal: Many critics worried that Hitler as the protagonist of
the story has to be shown as a human being. But by doing that you automatically
make him sympathetic.
Moonves: In no way, shape or form is this man in this film a sympathetic
figure. He is a monster. And it’s how he got to be that way. At no point
do you feel sympathy for this man and just say, 'Oh, I understand, I feel
bad this is why he did what he did.' That emotion should never occur.
Jewish Journal: Has Rabbi Harvey Fields from Wilshire Boulevard
Temple vetted the script?
Moonves: He read the first two hours and gave us extensive notes.
Those notes have been incorporated into some of the changes and he’s reading
the second part as we speak. He’s an unofficial friend in court, but once
again, certainly he’s amongst the most widely respected religious leaders
in ours or any community ...
Jewish Journal: Wasn’t your own wife opposed to the project?
Moonves: I don’t want to talk about my personal situation. There
has been a lot of discussions with friends and relatives. It certainly
is a lightning rod for a lot of people.
Jewish Journal: Did you lose family members in the Holocaust?
Moonves: I lost many relatives on both sides of the family. My
grandparents are both from Poland and they lost a number of siblings and
cousins, a great many family members during the Holocaust. They escaped
from Poland before the war began. But there were some who did not escape
... I really want your readers to know that this is something we are not
treating lightly. It’s one of the most important projects we’ve been involved
in and we are trying to do it with great care and great thought."
[The never-ending theme of growing Jewish dominance of the major means
of public communication may be found echoed in Canada, the U.S., Russia,
Great Britain, Poland, Brazil, and on and on.]
Anti-semitism
fear as Italian TV chief under attack,
Guardian (UK), March 10,. 2003
"Jewish leaders in Italy have expressed concern at an outbreak of
anti-semitism after a rightwing newspaper yesterday made a thinly-veiled
attack on the state broadcaster RAI days after a distinguished journalist
of Jewish origin was chosen to lead its board of directors. Paolo Mieli,
the former editor-in-chief of Italy's leading daily Corriere della
Sera, was chosen for the job on Friday. Yesterday a front-page editorial
in the rightwing Rome daily Il Tempo said that Italian television
was being dominated by 'non-Catholic culture and sensibility', making
direct reference to Mieli and two other journalists of Jewish origin.
'The entire TV system is dominated now by professionals of excellent quality,
but with non-Catholic culture and sensibility, like the new president
of RAI and the directors of the two major news programmes,' the editorial
said."
[Gil Cates is Jewish,
as is the war against Iraq.]
Oscars blacklist
stars in bid to prevent peace protest speeches,
The Scotsman (Scotland), March 11, 2003
"The backlash against prominent stars opposing any attack on Iraq
has impacted on this year’s Oscars, with organisers drawing up a blacklist
of people who will not be allowed a platform to air anti-war views. Meryl
Streep, Sean Penn, Vanessa Redgrave, George Clooney, Dustin Hoffman and
Spike Lee are among those who will not be speaking, amid fears they could
turn the ceremony into an anti-war rally. In a move denounced by some
as a return to McCarthyism, star presenters have been ordered to stick
to scripts, while winners, who the producers have no control over, could
find their acceptance speeches cut if they say anything much more than
a brief thank you. Officially, executives say that politics is a turn-off
for the show’s television audience. But in the wake of a public backlash
against actors such as Martin Sheen, from the West Wing, who have voiced
opposition to war, producers do not want to upset advertisers who have
paid more than £50 million for adverts ... Gil Cates, one of the
ceremony’s producers, wants the ceremony, which takes place on 23 March,
to celebrate the Oscars’ 75th anniversary rather than the anti-Bush/Blair
movement. And he admitted he thought it 'inappropriate' for stars to use
their slots to spotlight world problems. But Tom O’Neil, an Oscar historian,
said: 'Political tantrums are inevitable. You’re dealing with a class
of people who have unchecked egos and who are invited on talk shows to
be experts on everything from high art to pop culture.' Top of the loose-cannon
list this year is the Bowling for Columbine director, Michael Moore, a
favourite to win the documentary feature award. Last month, Moore thanked
the French for not supporting the proposed Iraqi invasion while accepting
an award in Paris. And on Saturday, he used the Writers Guild of America
awards in Los Angeles to voice his opinions of George Bush, the US president.
Worryingly, for the Oscar producers, Moore won loud applause after telling
the audience: 'What I see is a country that does not like what’s going
on. Let’s all commit ourselves to Bush removal in 2004.' If Moore does
not win an Oscar, insiders claim Hollywood will be reverting back to the
witch-hunting 1950s, when Senator Joseph McCarthy and his cohorts destroyed
the careers of supposed Communist sympathies."
[Incredible! Jewish domination returns to Germany. Israeli-American
Haim Saban is set to take over Germany's largest media conglommerate!
This article doesn't mention the fact that Saban is both Jewish and Israeli
-- and THAT is the real news. And look who's banking both ends of the
deal -- the Jewish German Rothschild-Warburg banking firm, big time survivors
of Hitlerism.]
KirchMedia
hopes to ink Saban deal by Monday,
Reuters, March 14, 2003
"Insolvent German media group KirchMedia said on Friday it hoped
to sign a deal to sell its television assets to U.S. billionaire Haim
Saban by Monday at the latest, ending a year-long auction. Saban
has arrived in Munich to help put the final touches to a two-billion-euro
($2.2 billion) deal that would open up Germany's clubby media industry
to a Hollywood figure -- teamed up with French TV group TF1 -- for the
first time ... After a year of sometimes high drama, Saban has
trumped an offer by German publisher Heinrich Bauer Verlag for a stake
in Germany's largest commercial broadcaster ProSiebenSat.1 Media and a
vast library of film rights. Saban, who made his fortune with children's
TV figures such as the 'Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers" is now the sole
contender for KirchMedia after Bauer, teamed up with Germany's No. 2 bank
HVB Group, pulled out of the deal on Wednesday. ... Saban jumped
back into the bidding this year, overtaking Bauer with a spruced-up offer.
N.M. Rothschild & Sons is advising Saban. UBS Warburg is
advising KirchMedia."
[Hollywood IS politics. Who runs Hollywood? And who runs American
foreign policy?]
Hollywood
and politics have been in bed for a long time,
New Zealand Herald, March 31, 2003
"Go Michael Moore, the maker of Bowling for Columbine, who
on Oscar night took his first statue and his umpteenth risk with the words
'Shame on you , Mr Bush, shame on you'. The awards crowd was astir, the
orchestra struck up, Titanic-like, with a chirpy ditty amid the booing,
and Michael waved, smiled warmly and took his golden man off stage. His
55-second speech included an accusation that Bush was a fictitious president
who had brought his country to war for fictitious reasons. Go Michael
Moore. That speech was never going to go down easy, and Moore knew it.
He would have walked to that podium with the same relish most of us walk
into a chocolate shop. Controversy is his fix. It's why he gets up in
the morning ... We're talking about Hollywood here. The idea that the
film industry isn't about politics is exactly the sort of deceptive myth-making
Moore loves to rip wide open. Hollywood and politics have been in bed
together since Adam and Eve. Well almost. Since the late 1890 ... During
World War II, Germany made 1300 films commissioned by the Nazis. Hollywood
was in on the same game and made 300 World War II movies that were essentially
propaganda films. They showed bold and brave American soldiers fighting
a heinous enemy. Every note the government wanted hit was struck on cue
... The White House had a meeting with movers and shakers in Hollywood
in November 2001 asking their co-operation in the message that needed
to go out post-September 11. Remember Laura from Little House on the Prairie?
In real life she's Melissa Gilbert [also Jewish],
the president of the American Screen Actors Guild, and according to E!
Online she was at that meeting, with the chiefs at Paramount and Walt
Disney among others ... So for someone to say the Oscars are no forum
for politics is just another of those grand deceits on which Hollywood
prides itself, and our only defence is to be smarter than they think we
are. They think we believe Punch hits Judy, but we know Punch doesn't
hit Judy, the puppeteer does."
[The compiler -- Jeffrey Blankfort of the material below -- is Jewish.
Note: this list is just a fraction of the full
story of Jewish influence in the mass media. But note also: there
are a few mistakes in this list.]
JEWS IN THE MEDIA,
(Appendix to Invading Iraq: Converging U.S. and Israeli Agenda)
Compiled by Jeffrey Blankfort, Demographic,
Environmental and Security Issues Project, April 2003
MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report
and chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations,
one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.
LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David
Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory Committee
on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.
JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner
NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News
JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC
DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News
SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, "world's biggest media giant" (Economist,
11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the world, Blockbuster
video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.
MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.
RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News
of the World (Jewish mother)
MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS
DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS
JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS
DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning,
CBS
SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment
LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment
BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.
SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman
of Paramount Pictures' Motion Picture Group.
HARVEY WEINSTEIN, CEO. Miramax Films.
BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.
PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp.,
owner of Fox TV
MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly
identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his
"mentor." ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times,
the Boston Globe and other publications.
WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post.
Honored by Honest Reporting.com, website monitoring "anti-Israel media."
RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post
JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe
NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for
USA Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the
Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers,
appointed by Clinton.
ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya's press secretary.
STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet's first choice as an expert
on domestic terrorism.
DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times
network of "alternative weeklies."
DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund KENNETH
POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle East
Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker
BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal
Entertainment
KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents
600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer and Bill O'Reilly.
TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.
MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL
WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL-
TimeWarner
JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment
JACK MYERS, NBC, chief….NYT 5.14.2
SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment
GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment
STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks
DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks
LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment
JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment
MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC's "Good Morning Miami"
HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America
AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures
JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann's American operations
ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications
BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment
IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications
WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN's Late Edition
LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live
TED KOPPEL, host of ABC's Nightline
ANDREA KOPPEL, CNN Reporter
PAULA ZAHN, CNN Host
MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes
BARBARA WALTERS, Host, ABC's 20-20 .
MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review
BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week
DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son
of CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post
HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek
WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director Project
for a New American Century
RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle
PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,
RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)
Syndicated in 100 markets
MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations
DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has
Israeli flag on his home page.
BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.
ANDREW LACK, president of NBC
DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins
DAVID REZNIK, Editor, The New Yorker
NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York
HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker SAMUEL
NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications,
includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group, includes
The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement; American City
Business Journals, business newspapers published in more than 30 major
cities in America; and interests in cable television programming and cable
systems serving 1 million homes.
DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated
Press.
PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron's
RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV. LAWRENCE
KIRSHBAUM, CEO, AOL-Time Warner Book Group
[Media monster Comcast is controlled by the Jewish Roberts family.]
The
Comcast shakedown. Flush with its purchase of AT&T Broadband, the biggest
cable company on the block intends to make size matter,
by Chishen Wei, Salon.com, April 8, 2003
"Now that the Comcast-AT&T Broadband merger has wrapped up its final
stage of system migration, Comcast cable subscribers are beginning to
feel the weight of the FCC-approved 800-pound gorilla. The acquisition
of AT&T Broadband last November gave Comcast control over 21 million cable
homes (roughly one in five TV homes). The media-communications giant wasted
little time flexing its newfound market muscle. On April 1, Comcast forced
its cable Internet subscribers to adopt a new pricing scheme that toes
the boundary of antitrust law. Current customers face a $15 (33 percent)
monthly increase -- unless they subscribe to Comcast's cable TV service.
Reaction to the move has been sharp, especially in California, where former
AT&T Broadband cable subscribers have found themselves bombarded in recent
weeks by a ubiquitous Comcast marketing campaign aimed at boosting Comcast's
cable Internet subscriber numbers. Before the price hike was even official,
Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., sent a letter to Michael Powell,
the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, decrying what she
called Comcast's 'monopolistic practices./"
Breaking News: Seinfeld to honor Israel,
Jewish Telegraphic Agency, April 10, 2003
"Jerry Seinfeld and Tony Bennett will highlight next month’s
celebration in Washington for Israel’s 55th anniversary. The 'Israel@55
'gala, scheduled for May 19, also will feature singer Norah Jones and
Israeli singer Achinoam 'Noa' Nini. Other performers will be announced
soon, and both Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and President
Bush are expected to attend."
[Head of CBS: Jewish mogul Leslie Moonves].
'Hitler' Exec
Producer Fired Over Remarks Thu,
TV zap2it.com, Apr 10, 2003
"The executive producer of a CBS miniseries about Adolf Hitler's
rise to power has been fired after giving an interview in which he compared
the current mood of Americans to that of the Germans who helped Hitler
rise to power. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Ed Gernon was
fired Sunday (April 6) from Alliance Atlantis, the production company
making 'Hitler: The Rise of Evil' for CBS. He had worked there 11 years
and was head of the firm's long-form programming division. Neither Gernon
nor Alliance Atlantis is commenting on the matter. 'Hitler' has caused
controversy ever since CBS announced its intentions last summer. In an
interview with TV Guide about the four-hour film, scheduled for May, Gernon
compares many Americans' acceptance of a war in Iraq to the fearful climate
in post-World War I Germany, of which Hitler took advantage to become
its ruler. 'It basically boils down to an entire nation gripped by fear,
who ultimately chose to give up their civil rights and plunged the whole
nation into war,' Gernon said in the interview. 'I can't think of a better
time to examine this history than now.' Gernon's remarks reportedly didn't
go over well at CBS, which has tried very hard to frame 'Hitler' as a
historical piece that in no way sensationalizes or offers excuses for
Hitler's actions."
[Unspoken context: Jewish dominance of Hollywood
and the omnipresent Jewish Lobby:]
Shooting
the Arabs. They're the studio's villains of choice when comes to depicting
terrorists, arms dealers or torturers. And after September 11, it looks
like getting worse. Author Jack Shaheen escorts Sean Clarke through the
shabby history of the Hollywood Arab,
The Guardian (UK), April 17, 2003
"If Hollywood does take up the story of blonde, blue-eyed Private
Jessica Lynch, there's at least one man who won't be optimistic about
the film's treatment of her Iraqi captors. Professor Jack Shaheen has
spent 20 years cataloguing Tinseltown's portrayal of Arabs in over 900
movies. He's found that, with very few exceptions, Arabs are presented
in the movies as 'subhuman' and destable to a degree that the studios
would no longer dare with any other ethnic group. Shaeen's new book, Reel
Bad Arabs, compares the case of Pocahontas - Disney's Native
American animation, on which Native American groups were widely consulted
in order to produce an acceptable portrait - with that of Aladdin, one
of the Arab and European world's most cherished folk tales, which features
'hook-nosed Arabs' singing of their milieu: 'it's barbaric, but hey, it's
home.' This, as Shaheen doesn't point out, in a story set in the Baghdad
Caliphate, the most culturally powerful and one of the most enlightened
polities of its time. 'The tragedy' he admits, 'is that we've begun to
unlearn other stereotypes' - about Blacks, Jews, Native Americans. 'But
we haven't with this one. And 9/11 took it to another level' ... Shaheen
even thinks the dehumanisation of Arabs in Hollywood can affect the US
public's attitude to war in Iraq. 'For instance,' he says, 'we hardly
ever see Arab suffering. Look at the war coverage - it's almost invisible.
It's almost as if the bombs are falling on empty buildings. And that's
been true historically, when every news report that comes out of Israel
rightly shows Israeli suffering, but wrongly passes over Palestinian suffering.
We have not allowed ourselves to empathise with Arabs or see them as being
like us' ... But when asked who's to blame for Hollywood's prejudices,
he identifies a less obvious culprit: the Arab American community itself.
'Hollywood can villify anything and everything Arab without getting any
pressure not to do that. There's no lobby in Hollywood. There are two
power centres in the US; Washington DC and Hollywood. One influences policy,
and the other influences perception. No Americans of Arab heritage have
recognised the importance of lobbying those who impact perception.'"
Our Humanity in the Balance,
By Carel Moiseiwitsch, Gordon Murray and Drew Penland, Winnipeg
Free Press, May 4, 2003
"We recently returned from the Occupied Territories of the West Bank
and Gaza where we volunteered with the International Solidarity Movement
(ISM). Upon returning to Vancouver, we were shocked by the disconnection
between our experience of Palestine and its portrayal in the Canadian
media. During our stay there, we accompanied and supported people whose
daily lives were being interrupted, interfered with and strangled by the
Israeli military. We saw humiliation, pain and death inflicted on ordinary
Palestinians. Back in Canada, we saw newspaper stories about the heroic
Israeli victims of barbaric Palestinian terrorists. Our point is not that
Israeli suffering is irrelevant or that Israeli deaths are inconsequential,
but that the North American media treat Palestinian suffering and death
as irrelevant and inconsequential. In the West Bank and Gaza, we observed
soldiers beating medical personnel and using them as human shields, taunting
young children to throw rocks at their tank so they could respond with
live ammunition, forcing women with infants to stand for hours in the
cold a few metres from their homes, destroying food and water systems,
and firing heavy machine guns into residential streets and buildings.
In short, the Israeli military did not seem to view Palestinians as human
beings. Soldiers at checkpoints gave us dire warnings that all Palestinians
would kidnap or murder us. On the contrary, the Palestinians we met were
incredibly warm, hospitable and generous, and many Israelis work bravely
to uphold human rights, including some who join ISM in Palestine. The
Israeli military claims many Palestinians they kill are "armed militants"
or at least "suspected militants". The vast majority have not been tried
or convicted of anything, but we are expected to trust this instant justice.
The logic seems to be that since the army doesn't target civilians, all
dead Palestinians somehow deserved their fate -- even a kid throwing stones
at a tank that could withstand an artillery shell. According to human
rights groups, 85 per cent of the Palestinians killed in the Occupied
Territories are civilians ... The Israeli army is killing and wounding
obvious non-combatants such as medical workers, journalists and international
human rights activists with increasing frequency ... The Israeli occupation
army's "policing" has killed more than 2,000 Palestinian civilians (including
more than 450 children) and demolished more than 3,000 Palestinian houses
since September, 2000. That's taking police brutality to a whole new level.
A stunning media imbalance is revealed by studies of U.S. coverage of
the Palestinian uprising. Analysis of the San Jose Mercury News
by Alison Wier, a former Sausalito editor, showed that it covered 73 per
cent of Israeli deaths on its front page from April to September, 2001,
compared to just five per cent of Palestinian deaths. Cursory readers
of the paper would be left with the impression that 500 Israelis -- but
only about 100 Palestinian civilians -- had been killed in the current
uprising, when the real figures are 700 Israelis and 2,000 Palestinian.
According to the media watchdog organization, Fairness and Accuracy in
Reporting (FAIR), National Public Radio (NPR) in the U.S. fared somewhat
better, reporting 34 per cent of Palestinian deaths and 81 per cent of
Israeli deaths in the first six months of 2001. However, the distortion
was much worse in the emotionally-charged category of dead children. Only
20 per cent of the killings of Palestinian children were reported, compared
to 89 per cent for Israeli children. In other words, being less than 18
years old makes your death more newsworthy to NPR if you are Israeli,
but less newsworthy if you are Palestinian. Our experience in the Occupied
Territories bears this out ... Portraying one side's suffering as more
tragic or important than the other's -- or some deaths as justified by
a simplistic "truth" that serves one side -- just facilitates violence.
The media must support the search for shared truths and not merely reiterate
the formulas of fundamentalist ideologues -- on either side of the Mideast
conflict -- that serve a single interest. All of us are responsible for
helping find a humane solution. To be silent is to be complicit in the
ongoing oppression."
[The Executive Producer of "Hitler: The Rise of Evil" is
Jewish: Peter Sussman. So is the head of CBS (which is running
the mini-series): Leslie Moonves.]
Peter
Sussman,
CBS
"Peter Sussman is the Chief Executive Officer of the Entertainment
Group at Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. and an Executive Producer
on HITLER: The Rise of Evil. Alliance Atlantis's extensive body of work
includes several films dealing with stories and events in connection with
the Holocaust and World War II. Many of these films were executive produced
by Mr. Sussman and they include the mini-series "Nuremberg" for
TNT, nominated for four Emmy Awards (winner of one) and three Golden Globe
Awards and the mini-series "Haven" for CBS, nominated for three Emmy Awards
and winner of the 2001 Humanitas Award. Mr. Sussman was also an
Executive Producer of the award winning feature film "The Quarrel," based
on the celebrated Yiddish short story by Chaim Grade entitled "My Quarrel
with Hersh Rasseyner." Other Alliance Atlantis feature
films on subjects relating to the Holocaust include "Sunshine,"
nominated for three Golden Globe Awards, including Best Film, as well
as "Prisoner of Paradise," nominated for an Academy Award in 2003 for
Best Feature Documentary. In addition, Mr. Sussman executive produced
the mini-series "Joan of Arc" for CBS, which was nominated for 13 Emmy
Awards (winner of one), four Golden Globe Awards, and won the Television
Critics Award for Best Movie, Mini-Series or Special."
TED
TURNER.Gone With the Wind Ted Turner is a worried man,
by Patricia Sellers, Fortune,
May 26, 2003
"No matter how immersed he gets in the Turnerverse, he cannot completely
escape the debacle of AOL Time Warner. One reason is legal: He is named
in several lawsuits, along with other senior executives, as a party to
alleged accounting violations. Another is psychological: Turner is obsessed
with Jerry Levin, AOL Time Warner's former CEO. As Turner's friends
note, he'll be conversing on any subject--restaurants, bison, ex-wives,
whatever--and find a way to lash out at Levin. 'The biggest mistake
I made was trusting Jerry too much,' Turner says. Turner and Levin
had a long association, dating back to the late '80s. At that time Turner,
overleveraged from his MGM acquisition, brought in a consortium of cable
investors, including Time Inc., where Levin was a top executive.
Turner says that Levin tried 'to keep me small' by twice denying
him the chance to buy NBC. The worst affront, the one that makes him bilious
to this day, occurred in 2000, a few months after Time Warner agreed to
merge with AOL. Levin told Turner he'd have to give up running
CNN and his other beloved cable properties. Turner could stay as vice
chairman, but he'd have no operating role. 'I should have left the company,'
says Turner, 'but I loved everybody. I was a hero.' (Levin declines
to comment.) Pushed aside, Turner took on the role of the angriest AOL
Time Warner shareholder ... The dumbest deal of all, in Turner's view,
was the AOL/Time Warner merger. "A total disaster!" he says. But Turner
did nothing to stop it. He says now that he didn't really understand the
Internet."
'The
Producers' Premieres in L.A.,
Earthlink (from Associated PRess), May 30,
2003
"Mel Brooks brought his singing Broadway bandits West as a
new production of his show-business satire 'The Producers' premiered with
Jason Alexander and Martin Short starring as the conniving theater
impresarios. Alexander took over Thursday night as Max Bialystock,
a lowlife theater producer who convinces the meek accountant Leo Bloom,
played by Short, to help him cheat elderly investors by creating a surefire
flop called 'Springtime for Hitler.' 'We had a great time tonight, we
really did,' Alexander said after the show. 'Sometimes it's like
climbing a mountain but tonight it was walking on air.' The story started
as a 1968 movie with Zero Mostel as Bialystock and Gene
Wilder as Bloom, but is perhaps best known as the Broadway
stage show that won a record 12 Tony Awards in 2001 with former stars
Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick. ... The story, Brooks has said,
was inspired by a real-life experience he had working
for a producer who would sleep with elderly women as a pretext for talking
them out of their wealth."
|