I find your site quite interesting. Most sites against Jews seem to stem either from nazi circles, either form Moslem ones. And nearly all start out denying the Holocaust. Your site is interesting in that it seems to stem from rather christian-humanistic circles, at first glance at least. And you don't deny the reality of the Holocaust, just the mentality that makes many Jews think it is quite normal for Holocaust to happen to others but not to themselves. Your site is technically not anti-semitic, it is a critique of the Jewish entity, far less mischevious than many critiques have made of their guest nations. An antisemite is somebody who believes in the evil existence of something biological about an alleged Jewish race, but what if the critic doesn't believe in any such thing as a racially unified jewish race? (The famous jewish type of antisemitic caricatures is not semitic, but armenoid, in purely technical terms). Since religion is not the business of most Jews and even then more used to self-serving causes than an end in itself, the only way to characterize the Jewish entity would be to call it not even a tribe, but a mafia, pure and simple. In the sicilian mafia there is much question of heredity and family values, catholic rituals are of prime importance, but no one could say the Cosa Nostra is a race or a peculiar Catholic sect. The Jews that are running Hollywood have vested interests in insisting on describing Italians in general as a mafia-ridden-people, and to insist upon the Cosa Nostra as the archetypal mafia, just to hide the fact that most of organised crime and racketing in Italy has for centuries and more been Jewish, not Sicilian. If it is not permissible to be critical of jewish mafia spirit, one could be sued for racism for being critical of Sicilian mafia more easily, and actually the jewish media tend to make not only the jews but all kinds of mafias unassailable by critique under pain of being considered a prejudiced under-achiever. Actually, the (jewish-made) Sopranos soap is an example of sheer anti-Italian racism far more than your site could be considered anti-semitic. I imagine what would happen if a soap were produced in India or elsewhere in the world where the Jewish crowd doesn't ride that high describing the corrupted and humanity-denegating life of jews as is being really led somewhere between Hollywood and Israel. I find your site interesting, but I must criticize you for not telling exactly and clearly who you are, at least from from what point of view you are writing, from what point of the political spectrum. Your organisation is quite anonymous, and I don't like that, for one malevolent critic could well surmise it is in fact an Islamic organisation trying to manipulate humanistic or left-leaning christian consciousness within the U.S. alleging true but carefully selected facts (surely there has been a tradition of utter contempt from Jew toward Poles in their very homeland, as you put it vividly but was it characteristic of the mainstream polish-jewish element?).

Firstly, what do you have against "Islamic organisations?" Secondly, it doesn't matter who we are. Why should it? Devoid of any stated politic, you can evaluate the information here on its own accord, purely. And do with it as you will, towards YOUR politic. The first premise is that people must have the range of facts openly before them before they embark upon any sort of action -- political or otherwise. Thirdly, per this web site, whether or not there was a tradition of "utter" Polish "contempt" towards Jews doesn't matter. Everywhere thoughout Western society Jewish convention claims that Poles "hate" Jews. And that's all we ever hear. The real issue here is balance, and who has the power to enforce its one-sided view. Even if such Jewish convention about Poles is true (and I don't think it is), traditional Jewish "hatred" of Poles -- and non-Jews generally -- is hidden from public view everywhere. But it is documented freely at this web site.

The most exact statistics themselves can be a superior form of lie.

You are posing this as a riddle. What is truth? I'd say you stack up all the pros and cons about any subject, openly, freely to all, and compare them in public forum. Then have some robust debate. That's supposed to be "democracy." But of course we don't have that. With the subject of Jews, this is impossible because ANY critical inquiry of Jewry represents an ENORMOUS taboo. The only "exact statistics" allowed in public consciousness about Jews reflects self-flattering Judeocentric notions -- the "superior form of lie" you mention.

The problem is not that the Jews are x times richer than the population they live among, the problem is as to what they do with such resources. For instance, it could be possible that the discipline imposed by Judaic practice generation after generation attracted intelligence and money, but that alas they squandered it all is egoistical and tribal enterprises as per the dicta of human nature in general.

Well, "Judaic practices" have indeed "attracted money." Is human nature innately exploitive, materialist, and degrading of others? There are individual exceptions to this cynical rule, which gives pause. "Human nature" or not, the issue remains that the self-defined social/political entity of Jewry is in the driver's seat and there is a very serious responsibility to bear. Whoever's driving the bus has full responsibility to stay on the right road.

I am nevertheless inclined to give you a devastating argument against Jewish pretention to supreme intelligence among mankind. The fact that they advance most instinctively is the number of Nobel prizes their group obtain. But the fact is that among the great inventors that brought us the various contraptions that made our modern civilisation possible a surprising small number of Jews is to be found, given their I.Q. The only domain of physical science where many Jews have achieved proeminence are those related to explosives, including nuclear ones. You can have all the Nobel Prizes of the world for centuries and still remain and underdeveloped country (China was one for centuries with her mandarins, India is one such instance where another very snob and gifted intelligentzia, the Brahmins, have done nothing for the advancement of their fellow human beings that are not of their caste, despite the fact that their theoretical knowledge is even vaster than the Western Nobel Prizes'). What you need is Edisons, Watts, Pasteurs, Flemings, Shockleys, Von Brauns, Diesels. What you need is self-sacrificing, not self-serving inventors. Real inventors are not Nobel prizes for they must go right against the paradigm in which they could achieve high grades and social recognition during their lifetime. Please develop further and post this argument in your main on-line book (A critique of Jewish preeminence in America).

Well, go ahead and YOU develop it. It's your line of interest and we're swamped with things to do. If your ideas are good, we'll post them. The issue of self-sacrifice for the common good is one of the foundations of this web site. We actually don't give a shit about Jews, except to the degree they make life rough for so many others. To the degree they lean into the generic human umbrella out of the rain, great. To the degree they sit in clusters kissing themselves and banging their own narcissistic drum at everyone elses' expense, to Hell with them.

There is a great danger that today's Jews turn into the Brahmins of tomorrow's West and bring all social and material progress to a halt, especially if everyone abandoned Christianity for some form of diluted judaism as the most benevolent Jews themselves wish (the Noachide commands, etc.). It is exactly what brought India to its present state of excessive social stratification. For ten centuries Buddhism superseded Brahmanism as the main and more compassionate religion of India, but the Brahmins managed during this interval to survive as a tribe of qualified professionals, court councillors and money-handlers, preserving both their identity and many of their privileges, and then came a time when the populace grew weary of decadent Buddhism and found Hindu ideas more appealing for intellect and senses (for instance Brahmanism was tolerant of prostitution and nude representation, as well of homosexuality, provided they as a caste we honored and paid in the process), and the Brahmin tribe came back in saddle with more force than ever before, installing a multi-cultural society that turned out to be the caste society as we know it today. (F)

Some good insights. Please elaborate on them and we'll post more.