Happy New Year. I find your site very interesting and informative, but I do have a question. Don't you think a lot of the things you state about Jews could really be said about power elites in general?

Do "power elites in general" originate in a religion, declare themselves to be an ethnicity, lean upon a racial component of identity, create their own nations from scratch, and dominate major sectors in the cultural, social, economic, and political realms of the world's sole "superpower?"

No.

If Jews can advocate so strongly for Israel, against our interests, then doesn't that indicate our political system is in need of reform?

Yes. So? What's your logic in suggesting we not name the details of a problem? Our political system has been coopted by Judeocentrism and Zionism. That means "Jews."

If the media can be controlled by a few elites, shouldn't that also be changed, whether or not they are Jewish (or just Zionist, like Murdoch)?

What do you think about change? You think it's like pulling off a bed spread? Media dominance by the Jewish Network should be changed. Of course. Why do you infer that its inappropriate to name the Jewish Network? You're not being clear with your argument. Sorry.

The huge corporate/industrial powerhouses are stealing from average people everywhere and destroying the environment, but even if there is a disproportionate number of Jews in this arena as well, isn't it still about curbing corporate power?

There are many issues/problem in the world. You will find a Jewish component in many of them. The very notion of "corporate power" may even arguably have a Jewish base and history: the "trans-world corporation" that transcends individual nation states rests upon the Jewish model. It's not my idea. A Jewish scholar suggested it. It makes sense. World Jewry is spread out throughout the world as a giant social/political/economic network with a common pool: Israel. There are of course exceptions to avid pro-Israelism within the Jewish community, but exceptions shine light on the norm.

One can also, of course, raise the issue of the notorious Rothschilds who, too, were original in their notions of the transnational money-making operation.

I think it is vitally important that we recognize the damage the Israel-firsters are doing to our country. I have no problem with that, and I am certainly no defender of the racist, Israel or the disciples of Zionism. However, I just wonder if we should be focusing on why ANY "special interest" group can get such a hold on our government, media, foreign policy, monetary system, etc.

So let's see. If a pro-white, Aryan First movement ran the American mass media, determined American foreign policy, had a small Aryan First country with nuclear bombs across the world, and on and on, you'd be looking for generalist questions about the nature of corporate power? I'm sorry. I don't think so. One defines what the problem(s) is. That's the first step to -- as you frame your abstract interest -- "reform." If you self-censor about what the problem is, how is it possible to ever implement change to remedy the situation?

Why is that even possible? By focusing on Jews, aren't we missing the real root issues?

No. In your email here, you're not even focusing on ANYTHING or ANYBODY. And you expect to "reform" the world from that position?! You speak so abstractly here, there is no substance. No one can function like that. And no one does. I presume yours is a case where idealism turns into fluff and then nothing whatsoever. Sorry. If you have a more detailed case, please make it.

I wouldn't appreciate this hijacking, no matter what group was responsible. What do you think?

What "hijacking?" What do I think about what? Do you mean it's a "hijacking" to underscore the fact that Jews dominate much of American society, most with at least some aim towards spreading their ethnocentric legends about themselves and Israel?

PS: It appears you don't publish names and email addresses. I would appreciate mine not being posted, if possible, as I have had some problems in the past (even just saying fairly moderate things!) with harassment from Israel's zealots--I suppose that doesn't surprise you. (CHH)

Not surprising. Now, given that, how come you want to talk about obtuse abstracts of vague, ephemeral"power elites?"